Validation of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Lucia Carril-Ajuria, Pernelle Lavaud, Cecile Dalban, Sylvie Negrier, Gwénaëlle Gravis, Robert J. Motzer, Christine Chevreau, Nizar M. Tannir, Stéphane Oudard, David F. McDermott, Brigitte Laguerre, Hans J. Hammers, Philippe Barthelemy, Elizabeth R. Plimack, Delphine Borchiellini, Marine Gross-Goupil, Ruiyun Jiang, Chung Wei Lee, Heshani de Silva, Brian I. RiniBernard Escudier, Laurence Albigès

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes across different solid tumors, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer. Data regarding the prognostic and/or predictive role of LIPI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are still scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether LIPI could be predictive of survival in mRCC patients.

METHODS: We used patient level data from three different prospective studies (NIVOREN trial: nivolumab; TORAVA trial: VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy (TT); CheckMate 214: nivolumab-ipilimumab vs sunitinib). LIPI was calculated based on a derived neutrophils/(leukocyte-neutrophil) ratio > 3 and lactate-dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, classifying patients into three groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI intermediate (int), 1 factor;LIPI poor, 2 factors) and/or into two groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI int/poor, 1-2 factors) according to trial sample size. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS: In the Nivolumab dataset (n = 619), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (LIPI-good 30.1 vs 13.8 months in the LIPI int/poor; HR= 0.47) and PFS (HR=0.74). In the VEGF/VEGFR-TT dataset (n = 159), only a correlation with PFS was observed. In the CheckMate214 dataset (n = 1084), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (nivolumab-ipilimumab OS LIPI good vs int/poor: HR=0.55, p < 0.0001; sunitinib: OS LIPI good vs int/poor: 0.38, p < 0.0001) in both treatment groups in univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment-LIPI correlated with worse survival outcomes in mRCC treated with either ICI or antiangiogenic therapy, confirming LIPI's prognostic role in mRCC irrespective of systemic treatment used.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114048
Pages (from-to)114048
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume204
Early online dateMar 8 2024
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Antiangiogenics
  • Biomarkers
  • LIPI
  • Prognosis
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Sunitinib/therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Nivolumab/therapeutic use
  • Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
  • Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Adult
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
  • Female
  • Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this