TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a decision regret scale
AU - Brehaut, Jamie C.
AU - O'Connor, Annette M.
AU - Wood, Timothy J.
AU - Hack, Thomas F.
AU - Siminoff, Laura
AU - Gordon, Elisa
AU - Feldman-Stewart, Deb
PY - 2003/7
Y1 - 2003/7
N2 - Background. As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions. Methods. A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures. Results. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to -0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001. Conclusions. The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.
AB - Background. As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions. Methods. A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures. Results. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to -0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001. Conclusions. The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.
KW - Decision making
KW - Patient decisions
KW - Regret
KW - Scale
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042808780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0272989X03256005
DO - 10.1177/0272989X03256005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12926578
AN - SCOPUS:0042808780
SN - 0272-989X
VL - 23
SP - 281
EP - 292
JO - Medical Decision Making
JF - Medical Decision Making
IS - 4
ER -