Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies

Daniel C. Edwards; David B. Cahn; Marc C. Smaldone; Alexander Kutikov

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002

Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies

Daniel C. Edwards, David B. Cahn, Marc C. Smaldone, Alexander Kutikov

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is imperative for objective and balanced assessment of treatment outcomes. CER that uses administrative databases (AD-CER) affords unique opportunities for large scale data analyses that potentially transcend limitations of small institutional datasets. Prostate cancer has received much attention from the AD-CER research community, whereas non-prostate genitourinary malignancies are less well-studied. The objective of this article is to review the currently available AD-CER that has been published in the non-prostate genitourinary malignancies space.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	193-212
Number of pages	20
Journal	Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume	36
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002
State	Published - Apr 2018

Keywords

Administrative databases
Comparative effectiveness research
Outcomes based research
Urologic malignancies

Access to Document

10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002

Cite this

@article{4251f13a392246ffab67592e164c6b14,

title = "Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies",

abstract = "Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is imperative for objective and balanced assessment of treatment outcomes. CER that uses administrative databases (AD-CER) affords unique opportunities for large scale data analyses that potentially transcend limitations of small institutional datasets. Prostate cancer has received much attention from the AD-CER research community, whereas non-prostate genitourinary malignancies are less well-studied. The objective of this article is to review the currently available AD-CER that has been published in the non-prostate genitourinary malignancies space.",

keywords = "Administrative databases, Comparative effectiveness research, Outcomes based research, Urologic malignancies",

author = "Edwards, {Daniel C.} and Cahn, {David B.} and Smaldone, {Marc C.} and Alexander Kutikov",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2018",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "193--212",

journal = "Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations",

issn = "1078-1439",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies

AU - Edwards, Daniel C.

AU - Cahn, David B.

AU - Smaldone, Marc C.

AU - Kutikov, Alexander

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is imperative for objective and balanced assessment of treatment outcomes. CER that uses administrative databases (AD-CER) affords unique opportunities for large scale data analyses that potentially transcend limitations of small institutional datasets. Prostate cancer has received much attention from the AD-CER research community, whereas non-prostate genitourinary malignancies are less well-studied. The objective of this article is to review the currently available AD-CER that has been published in the non-prostate genitourinary malignancies space.

AB - Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is imperative for objective and balanced assessment of treatment outcomes. CER that uses administrative databases (AD-CER) affords unique opportunities for large scale data analyses that potentially transcend limitations of small institutional datasets. Prostate cancer has received much attention from the AD-CER research community, whereas non-prostate genitourinary malignancies are less well-studied. The objective of this article is to review the currently available AD-CER that has been published in the non-prostate genitourinary malignancies space.

KW - Administrative databases

KW - Comparative effectiveness research

KW - Outcomes based research

KW - Urologic malignancies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028549084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000429902600027&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS

U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28867432

SN - 1078-1439

VL - 36

SP - 193

EP - 212

JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

IS - 4

ER -

Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this