Ultrasound mammography: A comparison with radiographic mammography

C. Cole-Beuglet, B. B. Goldberg, A. B. Kurtz, C. S. Rubin, A. S. Patchefsky, G. S. Shaber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

The results of 1,029 ultrasound B-scan examinations of the breast using two automated water-path scanners were correlated with histopathology data in 278 patients who had undergone biopsy. Of the 1,029 patients, a subgroup of 709 patients had both ultrasound mammograms (USM) and radiographic mammograms (XRM) obtained. A sensitivity for breast cancer of 69% was found for USM and 74% for XRM on initial independent readings when there was no knowledge of clinical data. These are not statistically different using the McNemar test for paired comparisons. When the USM were reinterpreted with the knowledge of the patient's age, history, physical examination, and, when available, the XRM interpretation, the USM sensitivity for breast cancer was 79%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)693-698
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume139
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Child
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mammography
  • Middle Aged
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultrasound mammography: A comparison with radiographic mammography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this