Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk

ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95%CI 0.44–1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.

Original languageEnglish
Article number12524
Pages (from-to)12524
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • BRCA1 Protein/genetics
  • BRCA2 Protein/genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms/genetics
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group C Protein/genetics
  • Fanconi Anemia/genetics
  • Female
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Genetic Variation
  • Humans
  • Sequence Deletion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this