Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: A RAND appropriateness panel

Ronald J. Halbert, Robert A. Figlin, Michael B. Atkins, Myriam Bernal, Thomas E. Hutson, Robert G. Uzzo, Ronald M. Bukowski, Khuda Dad Khan, Christopher G. Wood, Robert W. Dubois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND. New developments in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC) have suggested a need to reevaluate the role of systemic therapies. The authors convened a panel of medical and urologic oncologists to rate the appropriateness of the main options. METHODS. The authors used the RAND/University of California-Los Angeles Appropriateness Method to evaluate systemic therapy options and cytoreductive nephrectomy. After a comprehensive literature review, an expert panel rated the appropriateness of systemic options (108 permutations) and cytoreductive nephrectomy (24 permutations) for patients with MRCC. RESULTS. The appropriateness evaluation indicated that 27.3% of permutations were rated "appropriate," 46.9% were rated "inappropriate," and 25.8% were rated "uncertain. " There was a high rate of agreement (95%). Sunitinib and sorafenib were rated appropriate for patients with low-to-moderate risk regardless of prior treatment. Temsirolimus was rated appropriate for first-line therapy for higher risk patients. Interferon-α and low-dose interleukin-2 were rated inappropriate or uncertain. In patients who received prior immunotherapy, cytokines were rated inappropriate. In all permutations for evaluating systemic therapy, enrollment into an investigational trial was considered appropriate, treatment with bevacizumab was uncertain, and thalidomide was inappropriate regardless of risk status or prior therapy. For good surgical risk patients with planned immunotherapy, nephrectomy was rated appropriate in patients who had limited metastatic burden regardless of tumor-related symptoms and in symptomatic patients regardless of metastatic burden. Only the most favorable combination of surgical risk, metastatic burden, and symptoms generated an "appropriate" rating for patients with planned targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS. The current results begin the process of defining an appropriate role for cytokines, newer targeted therapies, and surgery in the treatment of MRCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2375-2383
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume107
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2006

Keywords

  • Angiogenesis inhibitors
  • Immunotherapy
  • Neoplasm metastasis
  • Nephrectomy
  • Practice guidelines
  • Renal cell carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: A RAND appropriateness panel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this