Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with chemotherapy preceding versus after surgical resection

  • Vivek Verma
  • , Christopher A. Ahern
  • , Christopher G. Berlind
  • , William D. Lindsay
  • , Surbhi Grover
  • , Joseph S. Friedberg
  • , Charles B. Simone
  • West Penn Allegheny Health System
  • Oncora Medical
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Maryland Medical System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: There are 2 main treatment paradigms recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): induction chemotherapy followed by resection (IC/R), and up-front resection with postoperative chemotherapy (R/PC). These paradigms are being compared in an accruing randomized phase II trial. In the absence of such completed trials, in this study we evaluated overall survival (OS) and postoperative outcomes of IC/R and R/PC. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for newly diagnosed epithelioid/biphasic MPM. Metastatic, node-positive, and/or cT4 disease was excluded, along with nondefinitive surgery and lack of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors independently associated with induction chemotherapy delivery. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate OS between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess factors associated with OS. Survival was also evaluated between propensity-matched populations. Last, postoperative outcomes were assessed between groups. Results: Overall, 361 patients (182 IC/R, 179 R/PC) were analyzed. Temporal trends revealed that IC/R is decreasing over time. Survival of the IC/R cohort was similar to that of R/PC patients (20.9 vs 21.7 months; P =.500); this persisted after propensity matching (20.8 vs 22.0 months; P =.270). However, patients who underwent IC/R experienced longer postoperative hospitalization (median 7 days vs 6 days; P =.001) and higher 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 0%; P =.020). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the only comparative investigation of the 2 major management paradigms of operable MPM. IC/R regimens are decreasing over time in the United States. Although associated with survival similar to R/PC, IC/R might be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Careful induction chemotherapy patient selection is thus highly recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)758-766.e1
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume157
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms/mortality
  • Male
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant
  • Mesothelioma/mortality
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects
  • Patient Selection
  • Pleural Neoplasms/mortality
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with chemotherapy preceding versus after surgical resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this