The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized, node-positive and metastatic prostate cancer

Benjamin T. Ristau, David Cahn, Robert G. Uzzo, Brian F. Chapin, Marc C. Smaldone

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

A lack of quality evidence comparing management strategies confounds complex treatment decisions for patients with high-risk prostate cancers. No randomized trial comparing surgery to radiation has been successfully completed. Despite inherent selection biases, however, observational and registry data suggest improved outcomes for patients initially managed with prostatectomy. As consensus shifts away from aggressive treatment for low-risk disease and toward multimodal treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease, there is renewed interest in surgery for local control in patients presenting with high-risk localized, node-positive and minimally metastatic disease. The objective of this review is to examine the evidence evaluating clinical outcomes of patients with high-risk clinically localized, node-positive and metastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-699
Number of pages13
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prostatectomy/methods
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized, node-positive and metastatic prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this