Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma

  • Tracy Klayton
  • , Tianyu Li
  • , Jian Q. Yu
  • , Lanea Keller
  • , Jonathan Cheng
  • , Steven J. Cohen
  • , Neal J. Meropol
  • , Walter Scott
  • , Xu Welliver Meng
  • , Andre Konski
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Ohio State University
  • Wayne State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if a qualitative and quantitative assessment of pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) F18-FDG PET scans of esophageal cancer patients could predict for residual disease in esophagectomy specimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of esophageal cancer patients who had undergone CRT at a single institution. Analysis was limited to esophagectomy patients with both pre- and post-CRT F18-FDG PET scans. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), location, and measured length of esophagus with increased F18-FDG uptake were obtained from the PET scan before and 3-4 weeks following CRT (preoperatively). The pattern of F18-FDG uptake was qualitatively assigned a category of diffuse, focal, or diffuse with focal component. Results: Fifty-seven patients with localized esophageal carcinoma underwent F18-FDG PET/CT scans as part of their initial staging and post-CRT restaging workup, followed by esophagectomy. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 25 %. The presence of a focal component on post-CRT PET predicted residual disease on univariate analysis (86 % vs. 64 %), and achieved significance when controlling for SUV and presence of diabetes on MVA (OR = 5.59, p = 0.028). There was no significant relationship between pre- or post-CRT SUV, tumor histology, or length of increased F18-FDG uptake and presence of residual disease. SUV and focality did not interact significantly to predict residual disease. Conclusions: Qualitative but not quantitative PET imaging can help predict increased likelihood of residual tumor in esophageal cancer patients following CRT; however, it is not sensitive enough to solely rule out the presence of residual disease. Additional investigation with a larger cohort of patients is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-618
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Positron-Emission Tomography/methods
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this