Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The national cancer institute’s community networks program initiative to reduce cancer health disparities: Outcomes and lessons learned

  • Kathryn L. Braun
  • , Susan Stewart
  • , Claudia Baquet
  • , Lisa Berry-Bobovski
  • , Daniel Blumenthal
  • , Heather M. Brandt
  • , Dedra S. Buchwald
  • , Janis E. Campbell
  • , Kathryn Coe
  • , Leslie C. Cooper
  • , Paula Espinoza
  • , Ronda Henry-Tillman
  • , Margaret Hargreaves
  • , Aimee James
  • , Judith Salmon Kaur
  • , K. Viswanath
  • , Grace X. Ma
  • , Jeanne Mandelblatt
  • , Cathy Meade
  • , Amelie Ramirez
  • Isabel Scarinci, Sora Park Tanjasiri, Beti Thompson, Anissa I. Vines, Mark Dignan
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Wayne State University
  • Morehouse School of Medicine
  • University of South Carolina
  • University of Washington
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services
  • University of Colorado
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Meharry Medical College
  • Siteman Cancer Center Washington University
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Harvard University
  • Georgetown University
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • The California State University
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health/Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • University of Kentucky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: We describe reach, partnerships, products, benefits, and lessons learned of the 25 Community Network Programs (CNPs) that applied community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce cancer health disparities. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were abstracted from CNP final reports. Qualitative data were grouped by theme. Results: Together, the 25 CNPs worked with more than 2,000 academic, clinical, community, government, faith-based, and other partners. They completed 211 needs assessments, leveraged funds for 328 research and service projects, trained 719 new investigators, educated almost 55,000 community members, and published 991 articles. Qualitative data illustrated how use of CBPR improved research methods and participation; improved knowledge, interventions, and outcomes; and built community capacity. Lessons learned related to the need for time to nurture partnerships and the need to attend to community demand for sustained improvements in cancer services. Implications: Findings demonstrate the value of government- supported, community–academic, CBPR partnerships in cancer prevention and control research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-32
Number of pages12
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 24 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Community Networks
  • Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Humans
  • Minority Groups
  • National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/organization & administration
  • Needs Assessment/organization & administration
  • Neoplasms/ethnology
  • Qualitative Research
  • Racial Groups
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The national cancer institute’s community networks program initiative to reduce cancer health disparities: Outcomes and lessons learned'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this