Abstract
Aims: To assess grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and costs of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Individual patient data from the all treated population in the CheckMate 214 trial (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 547; sunitinib, n = 535) were used to calculate the number of AEs. AE unit costs were obtained from US 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and inflated to 2020 values. Results: The proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time. Patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab had lower average per-patient all-cause grade 3/4 AE costs versus sunitinib (12-month: US15,170 vs US-20,342; 42-month: US-19,096 vs US-27,473). Conclusion: Treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with lower grade 3/4 AE costs than sunitinib.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1219-1234 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Future Oncology |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2022 |
Keywords
- CheckMate 214
- advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- adverse events
- costs
- nivolumab plus ipilimumab
- sunitinib
- temporal trends
- Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ipilimumab/adverse effects
- Sunitinib/adverse effects
- Humans
- Cost of Illness
- Nivolumab/adverse effects
- Drug Costs/trends
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Cost Savings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal trends of adverse events and costs of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver