Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Temporal trends of adverse events and costs of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma

  • Daniel M. Geynisman
  • , Ella X. Du
  • , Xiaoran Yang
  • , Selvam R. Sendhil
  • , Viviana Del Tejo
  • , Keith A. Betts
  • , Stephen Huo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: To assess grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and costs of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Individual patient data from the all treated population in the CheckMate 214 trial (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 547; sunitinib, n = 535) were used to calculate the number of AEs. AE unit costs were obtained from US 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and inflated to 2020 values. Results: The proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time. Patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab had lower average per-patient all-cause grade 3/4 AE costs versus sunitinib (12-month: US15,170 vs US-20,342; 42-month: US-19,096 vs US-27,473). Conclusion: Treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with lower grade 3/4 AE costs than sunitinib.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1219-1234
Number of pages16
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • CheckMate 214
  • advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma
  • adverse events
  • costs
  • nivolumab plus ipilimumab
  • sunitinib
  • temporal trends
  • Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Ipilimumab/adverse effects
  • Sunitinib/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Cost of Illness
  • Nivolumab/adverse effects
  • Drug Costs/trends
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
  • Cost Savings
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal trends of adverse events and costs of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this