TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic therapy in bladder preservation
AU - Girardi, Daniel M.
AU - Ghatalia, Pooja
AU - Singh, Parminder
AU - Iyer, Gopa
AU - Sridhar, Srikala S.
AU - Apolo, Andrea B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Bladder cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease. Even when presenting as localized muscle-invasive disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 70%, and the recurrence rate after radical cystectomy is approximately 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has the potential to downstage the primary tumor and treat micrometastases, leading to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in cure rates. There is level 1 evidence in favor of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy. However, data from clinical trials evaluating NAC for patients undergoing bladder-sparing treatments are less robust, so this strategy remains controversial. The response to NAC is prognostic and patients with favorable pathological response have better overall survival. Strategies to select patients based on molecular biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment decisions and even de-intensify treatment, avoiding local treatment for those with complete responses to systemic therapy. This review outlines the current literature on the use of NAC in the context of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, highlights neoadjuvant studies in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC, and discusses novel bladder-preservation strategies, including multimodality combinations and biomarker-driven studies of definitive chemotherapy.
AB - Bladder cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease. Even when presenting as localized muscle-invasive disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 70%, and the recurrence rate after radical cystectomy is approximately 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has the potential to downstage the primary tumor and treat micrometastases, leading to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in cure rates. There is level 1 evidence in favor of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy. However, data from clinical trials evaluating NAC for patients undergoing bladder-sparing treatments are less robust, so this strategy remains controversial. The response to NAC is prognostic and patients with favorable pathological response have better overall survival. Strategies to select patients based on molecular biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment decisions and even de-intensify treatment, avoiding local treatment for those with complete responses to systemic therapy. This review outlines the current literature on the use of NAC in the context of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, highlights neoadjuvant studies in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC, and discusses novel bladder-preservation strategies, including multimodality combinations and biomarker-driven studies of definitive chemotherapy.
KW - Biomarker
KW - Bladder sparing
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Urothelial carcinoma
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
KW - Cystectomy
KW - Cisplatin/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy
KW - Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Urinary Bladder/surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096892625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000890911900007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33223367
SN - 1078-1439
VL - 41
SP - 39
EP - 47
JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
IS - 1
ER -