TY - JOUR
T1 - Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma Patients with Reasons for Exclusion from MSLT-II
T2 - Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Analysis
AU - International High-Risk Melanoma Consortium
AU - Broman, Kristy K.
AU - Hughes, Tasha M.
AU - Dossett, Lesly A.
AU - Sun, James
AU - Carr, Michael J.
AU - Kirichenko, Dennis A.
AU - Sharma, Avinash
AU - Bartlett, Edmund K.
AU - Nijhuis, Amanda AG
AU - Thompson, John F.
AU - Hieken, Tina J.
AU - Kottschade, Lisa
AU - Downs, Jennifer
AU - Gyorki, David E.
AU - Stahlie, Emma
AU - van Akkooi, Alexander
AU - Ollila, David W.
AU - Frank, Jill
AU - Song, Yun
AU - Karakousis, Giorgos
AU - Moncrieff, Marc
AU - Nobes, Jenny
AU - Vetto, John
AU - Han, Dale
AU - Farma, Jeffrey
AU - Deneve, Jeremiah L.
AU - Fleming, Martin D.
AU - Perez, Matthew
AU - Baecher, Kirsten
AU - Lowe, Michael
AU - Bagge, Roger Olofsson
AU - Mattsson, Jan
AU - Lee, Ann Y.
AU - Berman, Russell S.
AU - Chai, Harvey
AU - Kroon, Hidde M.
AU - Teras, Roland M.
AU - Teras, Juri
AU - Farrow, Norma E.
AU - Beasley, Georgia M.
AU - Hui, Jane YC
AU - Been, Lukas
AU - Kruijff, Schelto
AU - Boulware, David
AU - Sarnaik, Amod A.
AU - Sondak, Vernon K.
AU - Zager, Jonathan S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: In sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma, two randomized trials demonstrated equivalent melanoma-specific survival with nodal surveillance vs completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Patients with microsatellites, extranodal extension (ENE) in the SLN, or >3 positive SLNs constitute a high-risk group largely excluded from the randomized trials, for whom appropriate management remains unknown. Study design: SLN-positive patients with any of the three high-risk features were identified from an international cohort. CLND patients were matched 1:1 with surveillance patients using propensity scores. Risk of any-site recurrence, SLN-basin–only recurrence, and melanoma-specific mortality were compared. Results: Among 1,154 SLN-positive patients, 166 had ENE, microsatellites, and/or >3 positive SLN. At 18.5 months median follow-up, 49% had recurrence (vs 26% in patients without high-risk features, p < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, 52 (31%) underwent CLND and 114 (69%) received surveillance. Fifty-one CLND patients were matched to 51 surveillance patients. The matched cohort was balanced on tumor, nodal, and adjuvant treatment factors. There were no significant differences in any-site recurrence (CLND 49%, surveillance 45%, p = 0.99), SLN-basin–only recurrence (CLND 6%, surveillance 14%, p = 0.20), or melanoma-specific mortality (CLND 14%, surveillance 12%, p = 0.86). Conclusions: SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, or >3 positive SLN constitute a high-risk group with a 2-fold greater recurrence risk. For those managed with nodal surveillance, SLN-basin recurrences were more frequent, but all-site recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality were comparable to patients treated with CLND. Most recurrences were outside the SLN-basin, supporting use of nodal surveillance for SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, and/or >3 positive SLN.
AB - Background: In sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma, two randomized trials demonstrated equivalent melanoma-specific survival with nodal surveillance vs completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Patients with microsatellites, extranodal extension (ENE) in the SLN, or >3 positive SLNs constitute a high-risk group largely excluded from the randomized trials, for whom appropriate management remains unknown. Study design: SLN-positive patients with any of the three high-risk features were identified from an international cohort. CLND patients were matched 1:1 with surveillance patients using propensity scores. Risk of any-site recurrence, SLN-basin–only recurrence, and melanoma-specific mortality were compared. Results: Among 1,154 SLN-positive patients, 166 had ENE, microsatellites, and/or >3 positive SLN. At 18.5 months median follow-up, 49% had recurrence (vs 26% in patients without high-risk features, p < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, 52 (31%) underwent CLND and 114 (69%) received surveillance. Fifty-one CLND patients were matched to 51 surveillance patients. The matched cohort was balanced on tumor, nodal, and adjuvant treatment factors. There were no significant differences in any-site recurrence (CLND 49%, surveillance 45%, p = 0.99), SLN-basin–only recurrence (CLND 6%, surveillance 14%, p = 0.20), or melanoma-specific mortality (CLND 14%, surveillance 12%, p = 0.86). Conclusions: SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, or >3 positive SLN constitute a high-risk group with a 2-fold greater recurrence risk. For those managed with nodal surveillance, SLN-basin recurrences were more frequent, but all-site recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality were comparable to patients treated with CLND. Most recurrences were outside the SLN-basin, supporting use of nodal surveillance for SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, and/or >3 positive SLN.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data
KW - Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Lymph Node Excision/standards
KW - Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis
KW - Male
KW - Melanoma/diagnosis
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Patient Selection
KW - Prognosis
KW - Propensity Score
KW - Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/statistics & numerical data
KW - Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology
KW - Skin Neoplasms/mortality
KW - Watchful Waiting/standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099435738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 33316427
AN - SCOPUS:85099435738
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 232
SP - 424
EP - 431
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 4
ER -