Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Styles of Coping With Threat: Implications for Health

  • Temple University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

275 Scopus citations

Abstract

We explored individual differences in health-seeking behavior and health status in a primary care population. Specifically, we compared high monitors (those who typically scan for threat-relevant information) with low monitors (those who typically ignore threat-relevant information), while controlling for depression. Overall, high monitors came to the physician with less severe medical problems than did low monitors. Nevertheless, high monitors reported equivalent levels of discomfort, dysfunction, and distress compared with low monitors. Furthermore, during the week following their visit, high monitors expressed less symptom improvement in both physical and psychological problems than did low monitors. Finally, high monitors demanded more tests, information, and counseling during their visit than did their low monitoring counterparts, yet desired a less active role in their own care. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-148
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1988

Keywords

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adult
  • Arousal
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Psychological Tests
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Sick Role

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Styles of Coping With Threat: Implications for Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this