TY - JOUR
T1 - Salvage prostate brachytherapy in radiorecurrent prostate cancer
T2 - An international Delphi consensus study
AU - Corkum, Mark T.
AU - Buyyounouski, Mark K.
AU - Chang, Albert J.
AU - Chung, Hans T.
AU - Chung, Peter
AU - Cox, Brett W.
AU - Crook, Juanita M.
AU - Davis, Brian J.
AU - Frank, Steven J.
AU - Henriquez, Ivan
AU - Horwitz, Eric M.
AU - Hoskin, Peter
AU - Hsu, I. Chow
AU - Keyes, Mira
AU - King, Martin T.
AU - Kollmeier, Marisa A.
AU - Krauss, Daniel J.
AU - Kukielka, Andrzej M.
AU - Morton, Gerard
AU - Orio, Peter F.
AU - Pieters, Bradley R.
AU - Potters, Louis
AU - Rossi, Peter J.
AU - Showalter, Timothy N.
AU - Solanki, Abhishek A.
AU - Song, Daniel
AU - Vanneste, Ben
AU - Vigneault, Eric
AU - Wojcieszek, Piotr A.
AU - Zelefsky, Michael J.
AU - Kamrava, Mitchell
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Background and Purpose: Local recurrences after previous radiotherapy (RT) are increasingly being identified in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage prostate brachytherapy (BT) is an effective and well tolerated treatment option. We sought to generate international consensus statements on the use and preferred technical considerations for salvage prostate BT. Materials and Methods: International experts in salvage prostate BT were invited (n = 34) to participate. A three-round modified Delphi technique was utilized, with questions focused on patient- and cancer-specific criteria, type and technique of BT, and follow-up. An a priori threshold for consensus of ≥ 75% was set, with a majority opinion being ≥ 50%. Results: Thirty international experts agreed to participate. Consensus was achieved for 56% (18/32) of statements. Consensus was achieved in several areas of patient selection: 1) A minimum of 2–3 years from initial RT to salvage BT; 2) MRI and PSMA PET should be obtained; and 3) Both targeted and systematic biopsies should be performed. Several areas did not reach consensus: 1) Maximum T stage/PSA at time of salvage; 2) Utilization/duration of ADT; 3) Appropriateness of combining local salvage with SABR for oligometastatic disease and 4) Repeating a second course of salvage BT. A majority opinion preferred High Dose-Rate salvage BT, and indicated that both focal and whole gland techniques could be appropriate. There was no single preferred dose/fractionation. Conclusion: Areas of consensus within our Delphi study may serve as practical advice for salvage prostate BT. Future research in salvage BT should address areas of controversy identified in our study.
AB - Background and Purpose: Local recurrences after previous radiotherapy (RT) are increasingly being identified in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage prostate brachytherapy (BT) is an effective and well tolerated treatment option. We sought to generate international consensus statements on the use and preferred technical considerations for salvage prostate BT. Materials and Methods: International experts in salvage prostate BT were invited (n = 34) to participate. A three-round modified Delphi technique was utilized, with questions focused on patient- and cancer-specific criteria, type and technique of BT, and follow-up. An a priori threshold for consensus of ≥ 75% was set, with a majority opinion being ≥ 50%. Results: Thirty international experts agreed to participate. Consensus was achieved for 56% (18/32) of statements. Consensus was achieved in several areas of patient selection: 1) A minimum of 2–3 years from initial RT to salvage BT; 2) MRI and PSMA PET should be obtained; and 3) Both targeted and systematic biopsies should be performed. Several areas did not reach consensus: 1) Maximum T stage/PSA at time of salvage; 2) Utilization/duration of ADT; 3) Appropriateness of combining local salvage with SABR for oligometastatic disease and 4) Repeating a second course of salvage BT. A majority opinion preferred High Dose-Rate salvage BT, and indicated that both focal and whole gland techniques could be appropriate. There was no single preferred dose/fractionation. Conclusion: Areas of consensus within our Delphi study may serve as practical advice for salvage prostate BT. Future research in salvage BT should address areas of controversy identified in our study.
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Prostate Brachytherapy
KW - Recurrent prostate cancer
KW - Salvage brachytherapy
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
KW - Humans
KW - Salvage Therapy/methods
KW - Male
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
KW - Brachytherapy/adverse effects
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - Prostate/pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154048125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000999445500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109672
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109672
M3 - Article
C2 - 37059334
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 184
SP - 109672
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
M1 - 109672
ER -