TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of a novel resection system for direct endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreas necrosis
T2 - a prospective, international, multicenter trial
AU - Stassen, Pauline M.C.
AU - de Jonge, Pieter Jan F.
AU - Bruno, Marco J.
AU - Koch, Arjun D.
AU - Trindade, Arvind J.
AU - Benias, Petros C.
AU - Sejpal, Divyesh V.
AU - Siddiqui, Uzma D.
AU - Chapman, Christopher G.
AU - Villa, Edward
AU - Tharian, Benjamin
AU - Inamdar, Sumant
AU - Hwang, Joo Ha
AU - Barakat, Monique T.
AU - Andalib, Iman
AU - Gaidhane, Monica
AU - Sarkar, Avik
AU - Shahid, Haroon
AU - Tyberg, Amy
AU - Binmoeller, Kenneth
AU - Watson, Rabindra R.
AU - Nett, Andrew
AU - Schlag, Christoph
AU - Abdelhafez, Mohamed
AU - Friedrich-Rust, Mireen
AU - Schlachterman, Alexander
AU - Chiang, Austin L.
AU - Loren, David
AU - Kowalski, Thomas
AU - Kahaleh, Michel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background and Aims: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) lacks dedicated instruments and requires repetitive and cumbersome procedures. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new powered endoscopic debridement (PED) system designed to simultaneously resect and remove solid debris within WOPN. Methods: This was a single-arm, prospective, multicenter, international device trial conducted from November 2018 to August 2019 at 10 sites. Patients with WOPN ≥6 cm and ≤22 cm and with >30% solid debris were enrolled. The primary endpoint was safety through 21 days after the last DEN procedure. Efficacy outcomes included clearance of necrosis, procedural time, adequacy of debridement, number of procedures until resolution, hospital stay duration, and quality of life. Results: Thirty patients (mean age, 55 years; 60% men) underwent DEN with no device-related adverse events. Of 30 patients, 15 (50%) achieved complete debridement in 1 session and 20 (67%) achieved complete debridement within 2 or fewer sessions. A median of 1.5 interventions (range, 1-7) were required. Median hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 22). There was an overall reduction of 91% in percent necrosis within WOPN from baseline to follow-up and 85% in collection volume. Baseline WOPN volume was positively correlated with the total number of interventions (ρ =.363, P =.049). Conclusions: The new PED system seems to be a safe and effective treatment tool for WOPN, resulting in fewer interventions and lower hospital duration when compared with published data on using conventional instruments. Randomized controlled trials comparing the PED system with conventional DEN are needed. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03694210.)
AB - Background and Aims: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) lacks dedicated instruments and requires repetitive and cumbersome procedures. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new powered endoscopic debridement (PED) system designed to simultaneously resect and remove solid debris within WOPN. Methods: This was a single-arm, prospective, multicenter, international device trial conducted from November 2018 to August 2019 at 10 sites. Patients with WOPN ≥6 cm and ≤22 cm and with >30% solid debris were enrolled. The primary endpoint was safety through 21 days after the last DEN procedure. Efficacy outcomes included clearance of necrosis, procedural time, adequacy of debridement, number of procedures until resolution, hospital stay duration, and quality of life. Results: Thirty patients (mean age, 55 years; 60% men) underwent DEN with no device-related adverse events. Of 30 patients, 15 (50%) achieved complete debridement in 1 session and 20 (67%) achieved complete debridement within 2 or fewer sessions. A median of 1.5 interventions (range, 1-7) were required. Median hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 22). There was an overall reduction of 91% in percent necrosis within WOPN from baseline to follow-up and 85% in collection volume. Baseline WOPN volume was positively correlated with the total number of interventions (ρ =.363, P =.049). Conclusions: The new PED system seems to be a safe and effective treatment tool for WOPN, resulting in fewer interventions and lower hospital duration when compared with published data on using conventional instruments. Randomized controlled trials comparing the PED system with conventional DEN are needed. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03694210.)
KW - Drainage/methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Necrosis/surgery
KW - Pancreas/surgery
KW - Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Stents
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118967209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.025
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 34562471
AN - SCOPUS:85118967209
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 95
SP - 471
EP - 479
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 3
ER -