Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Role of Active Surveillance for Localized Small Renal Masses

  • Maria Carmen Mir
  • , Umberto Capitanio
  • , Riccardo Bertolo
  • , Idir Ouzaid
  • , Maciej Salagierski
  • , Maximilian Kriegmair
  • , Alessandro Volpe
  • , Michael A.S. Jewett
  • , Alexander Kutikov
  • , Phillip M. Pierorazio
  • Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
  • University of Turin
  • Université Paris Cité
  • University of Zielona Gora
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Ospedale Maggiore
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

107 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Stage migration of organ-confined renal masses is occurring as a result of incidental diagnosis, especially in the elderly. Active surveillance (AS) is gaining clinical traction as a treatment alternative to surgery and focal therapy. Objective: To assess contemporary data and evaluate AS risk trade-offs in the treatment of organ-confined kidney cancer. Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive search of the Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases was carried out. A systematic review of the role of AS for organ-confined renal masses was performed. A total of 28 studies were included in the systematic review. Evidence synthesis: The median linear tumor growth rate for clinically localized renal masses (CLRMs) was 0.37 cm/yr (interquartile range 0.15–0.7), with 0.22 cm/yr in the cT1a subgroup and 0.45 cm/yr in the cT1b––2 subgroup. The metastatic progression rate was 1–6% and was similar for cT1a (1–6%) and cT1b (0–5%); other-cause mortality for patients with CLRMs was 0–45% (1–25% for cT1a vs 11–13% for cT1b–2); cancer-specific mortality ranged between 0% and 18%. According to the 2011 Oxford scale, AS as a treatment option for CLRMs remains supported by level 3 evidence. Conclusions: Although no randomized clinical data are available, current data support oncologic safety for AS in the management of CLRMs, particularly for small renal masses and among elderly and/or comorbid patients. Patient summary: In this review we looked at the outcomes for patients with small kidney masses managed with surveillance. We found that surveillance is a safe initial option for tumors of less than 2 cm, especially in elderly and sick patients. Active surveillance for clinically localized renal masses is a safe initial option, especially for masses of <2 cm in elderly and sick patients. Further investigation to establish active surveillance protocols and follow-up are still missing. Prospective nonrandomized registry collection of data for patients with small renal masses is ongoing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-187
Number of pages11
JournalEUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology
  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology
  • Kidney/pathology
  • Tumor Burden
  • Watchful Waiting/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Role of Active Surveillance for Localized Small Renal Masses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this