Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial

Michael C. Heinrich, Robin L. Jones, Suzanne George, Hans Gelderblom, Patrick Schöffski, Margaret von Mehren, John R. Zalcberg, Yoon Koo Kang, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Jonathan Trent, Steven Attia, Axel Le Cesne, Brittany L. Siontis, David Goldstein, Kjetil Boye, Cesar Sanchez, Neeltje Steeghs, Piotr Rutkowski, Mihaela Druta, César SerranoNeeta Somaiah, Ping Chi, William Reichmann, Kam Sprott, Haroun Achour, Matthew L. Sherman, Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto, Jean Yves Blay, Sebastian Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRIGUE was an open-label, phase 3 study in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib and who were randomized to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or sunitinib 50 mg. In the primary analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) with ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib. In clinical and nonclinical studies, ripretinib and sunitinib have demonstrated differential activity based on the exon location of KIT mutations. Therefore, we hypothesized that mutational analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might provide further insight. In this exploratory analysis (N = 362), baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by a 74-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing–based assay. ctDNA was detected in 280/362 (77%) samples with KIT mutations in 213/362 patients (59%). Imatinib-resistant mutations were found in the KIT ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and activation loop (exons 17/18). Mutational subgroup assessment showed 2 mutually exclusive populations with differential treatment effects. Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 13/14 mutations (ripretinib, n = 21; sunitinib, n = 20) had better PFS with sunitinib versus ripretinib (median, 15.0 versus 4.0 months). Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations (ripretinib, n = 27; sunitinib, n = 25) had better PFS with ripretinib versus sunitinib (median, 14.2 versus 1.5 months). The results of this exploratory analysis suggest ctDNA sequencing may improve the prediction of the efficacy of single-drug therapies and support further evaluation of ripretinib in patients with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-506
Number of pages9
JournalNature Medicine
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online dateDec 5 2024
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Naphthyridines
  • Mutation/genetics
  • Humans
  • Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Sunitinib/therapeutic use
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics
  • Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy
  • Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Biomarkers
  • Adult
  • Urea/analogs & derivatives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this