TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliable Confidence Intervals for RelTime Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence Times
AU - Tao, Qiqing
AU - Tamura, Koichiro
AU - Mello, Beatriz
AU - Kumar, Sudhir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Confidence intervals (CIs) depict the statistical uncertainty surrounding evolutionary divergence time estimates. They capture variance contributed by the finite number of sequences and sites used in the alignment, deviations of evolutionary rates from a strict molecular clock in a phylogeny, and uncertainty associated with clock calibrations. Reliable tests of biological hypotheses demand reliable CIs. However, current non-Bayesian methods may produce unreliable CIs because they do not incorporate rate variation among lineages and interactions among clock calibrations properly. Here, we present a new analytical method to calculate CIs of divergence times estimated using the RelTime method, along with an approach to utilize multiple calibration uncertainty densities in dating analyses. Empirical data analyses showed that the new methods produce CIs that overlap with Bayesian highest posterior density intervals. In the analysis of computer-simulated data, we found that RelTime CIs show excellent average coverage probabilities, that is, the actual time is contained within the CIs with a 94% probability. These developments will encourage broader use of computationally efficient RelTime approaches in molecular dating analyses and biological hypothesis testing.
AB - Confidence intervals (CIs) depict the statistical uncertainty surrounding evolutionary divergence time estimates. They capture variance contributed by the finite number of sequences and sites used in the alignment, deviations of evolutionary rates from a strict molecular clock in a phylogeny, and uncertainty associated with clock calibrations. Reliable tests of biological hypotheses demand reliable CIs. However, current non-Bayesian methods may produce unreliable CIs because they do not incorporate rate variation among lineages and interactions among clock calibrations properly. Here, we present a new analytical method to calculate CIs of divergence times estimated using the RelTime method, along with an approach to utilize multiple calibration uncertainty densities in dating analyses. Empirical data analyses showed that the new methods produce CIs that overlap with Bayesian highest posterior density intervals. In the analysis of computer-simulated data, we found that RelTime CIs show excellent average coverage probabilities, that is, the actual time is contained within the CIs with a 94% probability. These developments will encourage broader use of computationally efficient RelTime approaches in molecular dating analyses and biological hypothesis testing.
KW - confidence intervals
KW - divergence times
KW - molecular evolution
KW - non-Bayesian methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078564536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/molbev/msz236
DO - 10.1093/molbev/msz236
M3 - Article
C2 - 31638157
AN - SCOPUS:85078564536
SN - 0737-4038
VL - 37
SP - 280
EP - 290
JO - Molecular Biology and Evolution
JF - Molecular Biology and Evolution
IS - 1
ER -