Redefining the Gender Gap in Urology Authorship: An 18-Year Publication Analysis

Megan Prunty, Stephen Rhodes, Helen Sun, Sarah P. Psutka, Kirtishri Mishra, Alexander Kutikov, David Chen, Lee Ponsky, Adam Calaway, Laura Bukavina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Academic authorship is a critical productivity metric used for academic promotion. Objective: To characterize temporal changes in female representation in academic authorship in ten primary urology journals as the complement of female urologists is increasing. Design, setting, and participants: Publication records were retrieved from 2002 to 2020 for the ten urology journals with the highest impact factor. The names of all authors were gathered and gender was inferred using first names. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Trends in first and last/senior authorship by gender were evaluated overall, within journals, and by geographic region. Results: A total of 59,375 articles were analyzed, of which 94.1% had gender information for the first author and 94.2% had gender information for the last author. The percentage of overall female authors increased positively from 17.2% (95% highest density interval [HDI] 12.9–21.4%) in 2002 to 27.2% (HDI 21.7–33.6%; p < 0.01) in 2020. Overall female first authorship increased from 15.2% (95% HDI 11.0–19.5%) to 28.5% (95% HDI 21.8–35.6%; p < 0.01). There was also significant growth for female senior authors from 10.4% (95% HDI 7.6–13.5%) to 18.6% (95% HDI 13.6–23.8%; p < 0.01). Assessment of journal-specific changes revealed that Neurourology and Urodynamics (12.6%, 95% HDI 9.9–15.1%) and The Journal of Sexual Medicine (16.2%, 95% HDI 13.6–19.0%) had significantly higher growth in female authorship when compared to Journal of Endourology (7.2%, 95% HDI 5.5–8.7%) and Urologic Oncology (4.5%, 95% HDI 2.0–6.8%; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although overall female authorship increased between 2002 and 2020, women remain underrepresented in urology authorship. The percentage of females in senior (last) author positions is less than the percentage of females in first author positions. Journal-specific differences can probably be attributed to gender-based differences in subspecialized fields. Patient summary: In this study, we characterized the underrepresentation of women as authors in urology journals and analyzed the change in female authorship for ten academic urology journals over the course of 18 years. Although the proportion of female authors has increased over that time, the percentage of females in senior authorship roles is less than the percentage of females in first author positions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1512-1519
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Urology Focus
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Practice patterns
  • Urology
  • Women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Redefining the Gender Gap in Urology Authorship: An 18-Year Publication Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this