Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the radiation therapy oncology group 0129 trial: Long-term report of efficacy and toxicity

Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan, Qiang Zhang, K. Kian Ang, Randal S. Weber, David I. Rosenthal, Denis Soulieres, Harold Kim, Craig Silverman, Adam Raben, Thomas J. Galloway, André Fortin, Elizabeth Gore, William H. Westra, Christine H. Chung, Richard C. Jordan, Maura L. Gillison, Marcie List, Quynh Thu Le

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

373 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We tested the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus accelerated fractionation with a concomitant boost (AFX-C) versus standard fractionation (SFX) in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LA-HNC). Patients and Methods: Patients had stage III to IV carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Radiation therapy schedules were 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (SFX) or 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks (AFX-C). Cisplatin doses were 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for two (AFX-C) or three (SFX) cycles. Toxicities were scored by using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the one-sided log-rank test. Locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated by using the cumulative incidence method and Gray's test. Results: In all, 721 of 743 patients were analyzable (361, SFX; 360, AFX-C). At a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 0.3 to 10.1 years) for 355 surviving patients, no differences were observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18; P = .37; 8-year survival, 48% v 48%), PFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.24; P = .52; 8-year estimate, 42% v 41%), LRF (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38; P = .78; 8-year estimate, 37% v 39%), or DM (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.24; P = .16; 8-year estimate, 15% v 13%). For oropharyngeal cancer, p16-positive patients had better OS than p16-negative patients (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.42; P < .001; 8-year survival, 70.9% v 30.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the grade 3 to 5 acute or late toxicities between the two arms and p-16 status. Conclusion: When combined with cisplatin, AFX-C neither improved outcome nor increased late toxicity in patients with LA-HNC. Long-term high survival rates in p16-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer support the ongoing efforts to explore deintensification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3858-3867
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume32
Issue number34
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
  • Carcinoma/mortality
  • Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects
  • Cisplatin/administration & dosage
  • Disease Progression
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Dose Fractionation, Radiation
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the radiation therapy oncology group 0129 trial: Long-term report of efficacy and toxicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this