TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized phase II study of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer prospectively stratified by beta-3 tubulin status
AU - Edelman, Martin J.
AU - Schneider, Claus Peter
AU - Tsai, Chun Ming
AU - Kim, Heung Tae
AU - Quoix, Elisabeth
AU - Luft, Alexander V.
AU - Kaleta, Remigiusz
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Pralay
AU - Trifan, Ovidiu C.
AU - Whitaker, Laura
AU - Reck, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2013/6/1
Y1 - 2013/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Retrospective studies have reported that tumor expression of the beta-3 tubulin (3T) isoform is an unfavorable prognostic factor in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tubulin-inhibiting chemotherapy. Ixabepilone is a tubulin-inhibiting agent with low susceptibility to multiple resistance mechanisms including 3T isoform expression in several tumor models. This randomized phase II study evaluated ixabepilone-based chemotherapy in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, compared with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Tumor specimens were prospectively evaluated for 3T expression. Patients and Methods: Patients were stratified by 3T status (positive v negative) and randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive ixabepilone (32 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under concentration-time curve [AUC], 6) or paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC, 6) for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the 3T-positive subgroup. Results: Ninety-five patients (3T positive, 52; 3T negative, 43) received ixabepilone plus carboplatin; 96 patients (3T positive, 49; 3T negative, 47) received paclitaxel plus carboplatin. No significant differences in median PFS were observed between arms for either subgroup (3T positive, 4.3 months in both arms; 3T negative, 5.8 v 5.3 months). Ixabepilone did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) for the 3T-positive subset or the overall population. Adverse events were similar between the two arms and comparable with those in previous studies. Conclusion: There was no predictive value of 3T in differentiating clinical activity of ixabepilone- or paclitaxel-containing regimens. Ixabepilone did not improve PFS or OS in patients with 3T-positive tumors. 3T-positive patients had worse PFS relative to 3T-negative patients, regardless of treatment; hence, 3T expression seems to be a negative prognostic factor, but not a predictive factor, in advanced NSCLC treated with either ixabepilone or paclitaxel platinum-based doublets.
AB - Purpose: Retrospective studies have reported that tumor expression of the beta-3 tubulin (3T) isoform is an unfavorable prognostic factor in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tubulin-inhibiting chemotherapy. Ixabepilone is a tubulin-inhibiting agent with low susceptibility to multiple resistance mechanisms including 3T isoform expression in several tumor models. This randomized phase II study evaluated ixabepilone-based chemotherapy in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, compared with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Tumor specimens were prospectively evaluated for 3T expression. Patients and Methods: Patients were stratified by 3T status (positive v negative) and randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive ixabepilone (32 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under concentration-time curve [AUC], 6) or paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC, 6) for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the 3T-positive subgroup. Results: Ninety-five patients (3T positive, 52; 3T negative, 43) received ixabepilone plus carboplatin; 96 patients (3T positive, 49; 3T negative, 47) received paclitaxel plus carboplatin. No significant differences in median PFS were observed between arms for either subgroup (3T positive, 4.3 months in both arms; 3T negative, 5.8 v 5.3 months). Ixabepilone did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) for the 3T-positive subset or the overall population. Adverse events were similar between the two arms and comparable with those in previous studies. Conclusion: There was no predictive value of 3T in differentiating clinical activity of ixabepilone- or paclitaxel-containing regimens. Ixabepilone did not improve PFS or OS in patients with 3T-positive tumors. 3T-positive patients had worse PFS relative to 3T-negative patients, regardless of treatment; hence, 3T expression seems to be a negative prognostic factor, but not a predictive factor, in advanced NSCLC treated with either ixabepilone or paclitaxel platinum-based doublets.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880673560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000319657600020&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3282
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3282
M3 - Article
C2 - 23589560
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 31
SP - 1990
EP - 1996
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 16
ER -