Randomized phase II study of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer prospectively stratified by beta-3 tubulin status

Martin J. Edelman, Claus Peter Schneider, Chun Ming Tsai, Heung Tae Kim, Elisabeth Quoix, Alexander V. Luft, Remigiusz Kaleta, Pralay Mukhopadhyay, Ovidiu C. Trifan, Laura Whitaker, Martin Reck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Retrospective studies have reported that tumor expression of the beta-3 tubulin (3T) isoform is an unfavorable prognostic factor in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tubulin-inhibiting chemotherapy. Ixabepilone is a tubulin-inhibiting agent with low susceptibility to multiple resistance mechanisms including 3T isoform expression in several tumor models. This randomized phase II study evaluated ixabepilone-based chemotherapy in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, compared with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Tumor specimens were prospectively evaluated for 3T expression. Patients and Methods: Patients were stratified by 3T status (positive v negative) and randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive ixabepilone (32 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under concentration-time curve [AUC], 6) or paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC, 6) for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the 3T-positive subgroup. Results: Ninety-five patients (3T positive, 52; 3T negative, 43) received ixabepilone plus carboplatin; 96 patients (3T positive, 49; 3T negative, 47) received paclitaxel plus carboplatin. No significant differences in median PFS were observed between arms for either subgroup (3T positive, 4.3 months in both arms; 3T negative, 5.8 v 5.3 months). Ixabepilone did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) for the 3T-positive subset or the overall population. Adverse events were similar between the two arms and comparable with those in previous studies. Conclusion: There was no predictive value of 3T in differentiating clinical activity of ixabepilone- or paclitaxel-containing regimens. Ixabepilone did not improve PFS or OS in patients with 3T-positive tumors. 3T-positive patients had worse PFS relative to 3T-negative patients, regardless of treatment; hence, 3T expression seems to be a negative prognostic factor, but not a predictive factor, in advanced NSCLC treated with either ixabepilone or paclitaxel platinum-based doublets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1990-1996
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume31
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase II study of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer prospectively stratified by beta-3 tubulin status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this