Race and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer in the randomized RxPONDER trial

  • Yara Abdou
  • , William E Barlow
  • , Julie R Gralow
  • , Funda Meric-Bernstam
  • , Kathy S Albain
  • , Daniel F Hayes
  • , Nancy U Lin
  • , Edith A Perez
  • , Lori J Goldstein
  • , Stephen K L Chia
  • , Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind
  • , Priya Rastogi
  • , Emilio Alba
  • , Suzette Delaloge
  • , Anne F Schott
  • , Steven Shak
  • , Priyanka Sharma
  • , Danika L Lew
  • , Jieling Miao
  • , Joseph M Unger
  • Debasish Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai, Kevin Kalinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phase III RxPONDER trial has affected treatment for node-positive (1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) less than 26. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial.

METHODS: The trial randomly assigned women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, RS, and treatment.

RESULTS: A total of 4048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) (70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS: NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared with NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)889-897
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume117
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
  • Black or African American/statistics & numerical data
  • Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data
  • Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
  • Receptors, Estrogen/analysis
  • Receptors, Progesterone/analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • White

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Race and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer in the randomized RxPONDER trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this