TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of Life and Performance Status From a Substudy Conducted Within a Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Concurrent Standard Radiation Versus Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
T2 - NRG Oncology RTOG 0129
AU - Xiao, Canhua
AU - Zhang, Qiang
AU - Nguyen-Tân, Phuc Felix
AU - List, Marcie
AU - Weber, Randal S.
AU - Ang, K. Kian
AU - Rosenthal, David
AU - Filion, Edith J.
AU - Kim, Harold
AU - Silverman, Craig
AU - Raben, Adam
AU - Galloway, Thomas
AU - Fortin, Andre
AU - Gore, Elizabeth
AU - Winquist, Eric
AU - Jones, Christopher U.
AU - Robinson, William
AU - Raben, David
AU - Le, Quynh Thu
AU - Bruner, Deborah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/3/15
Y1 - 2017/3/15
N2 - Purpose/Objective(s) To analyze quality of life (QOL) and performance status (PS) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated on NRG Oncology RTOG 0129 by treatment (secondary outcome) and p16 status, and to examine the association between QOL/PS and survival. Methods and Materials Eligible patients were randomized into either an accelerated-fractionation arm or a standard-fractionation arm, and completed the Performance Status Scale for the Head and Neck (PSS-HN), the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ), and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) at 8 time points from before treatment to 5 years after treatment. Results The results from the analysis of area under the curve showed that QOL/PS was not significantly different between the 2 arms from baseline to year after treatment (P ranged from.39 to.98). The results from general linear mixed models further supported the nonsignificant treatment effects until 5 years after treatment (P=.95,.90, and.84 for PSS-HN Diet, Eating, and Speech, respectively). Before treatment and after 1 year after treatment, p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients had better QOL than did p16-negative patients (P ranged from.0283 to <.0001 for all questionnaires). However, QOL/PS decreased more significantly from pretreatment to the last 2 weeks of treatment in the p16-positive group than in the p16-negative group (P ranged from.0002 to <.0001). Pretreatment QOL/PS was a significant independent predictor of overall survival, progression-free survival, and local-regional failure but not of distant metastasis (P ranged from.0063 to <.0001). Conclusions The results indicated that patients in both arms may have experienced similar QOL/PS. p16-positive patients had better QOL/PS at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Patients presenting with better baseline QOL/PS scores had better survival.
AB - Purpose/Objective(s) To analyze quality of life (QOL) and performance status (PS) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated on NRG Oncology RTOG 0129 by treatment (secondary outcome) and p16 status, and to examine the association between QOL/PS and survival. Methods and Materials Eligible patients were randomized into either an accelerated-fractionation arm or a standard-fractionation arm, and completed the Performance Status Scale for the Head and Neck (PSS-HN), the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ), and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) at 8 time points from before treatment to 5 years after treatment. Results The results from the analysis of area under the curve showed that QOL/PS was not significantly different between the 2 arms from baseline to year after treatment (P ranged from.39 to.98). The results from general linear mixed models further supported the nonsignificant treatment effects until 5 years after treatment (P=.95,.90, and.84 for PSS-HN Diet, Eating, and Speech, respectively). Before treatment and after 1 year after treatment, p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients had better QOL than did p16-negative patients (P ranged from.0283 to <.0001 for all questionnaires). However, QOL/PS decreased more significantly from pretreatment to the last 2 weeks of treatment in the p16-positive group than in the p16-negative group (P ranged from.0002 to <.0001). Pretreatment QOL/PS was a significant independent predictor of overall survival, progression-free survival, and local-regional failure but not of distant metastasis (P ranged from.0063 to <.0001). Conclusions The results indicated that patients in both arms may have experienced similar QOL/PS. p16-positive patients had better QOL/PS at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Patients presenting with better baseline QOL/PS scores had better survival.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Chemoradiotherapy/mortality
KW - Cisplatin/administration & dosage
KW - Dose Fractionation, Radiation
KW - Female
KW - Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality
KW - Humans
KW - Longitudinal Studies
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
KW - Prevalence
KW - Quality of Life/psychology
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Survival Rate
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - United States/epidemiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992206095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.07.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.07.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 27727063
AN - SCOPUS:84992206095
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 97
SP - 667
EP - 677
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 4
ER -