Quality of Life and Performance Status From a Substudy Conducted Within a Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Concurrent Standard Radiation Versus Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma: NRG Oncology RTOG 0129

Canhua Xiao, Qiang Zhang, Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân, Marcie List, Randal S. Weber, K. Kian Ang, David Rosenthal, Edith J. Filion, Harold Kim, Craig Silverman, Adam Raben, Thomas Galloway, Andre Fortin, Elizabeth Gore, Eric Winquist, Christopher U. Jones, William Robinson, David Raben, Quynh Thu Le, Deborah Bruner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s) To analyze quality of life (QOL) and performance status (PS) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated on NRG Oncology RTOG 0129 by treatment (secondary outcome) and p16 status, and to examine the association between QOL/PS and survival. Methods and Materials Eligible patients were randomized into either an accelerated-fractionation arm or a standard-fractionation arm, and completed the Performance Status Scale for the Head and Neck (PSS-HN), the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ), and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) at 8 time points from before treatment to 5 years after treatment. Results The results from the analysis of area under the curve showed that QOL/PS was not significantly different between the 2 arms from baseline to year after treatment (P ranged from.39 to.98). The results from general linear mixed models further supported the nonsignificant treatment effects until 5 years after treatment (P=.95,.90, and.84 for PSS-HN Diet, Eating, and Speech, respectively). Before treatment and after 1 year after treatment, p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients had better QOL than did p16-negative patients (P ranged from.0283 to <.0001 for all questionnaires). However, QOL/PS decreased more significantly from pretreatment to the last 2 weeks of treatment in the p16-positive group than in the p16-negative group (P ranged from.0002 to <.0001). Pretreatment QOL/PS was a significant independent predictor of overall survival, progression-free survival, and local-regional failure but not of distant metastasis (P ranged from.0063 to <.0001). Conclusions The results indicated that patients in both arms may have experienced similar QOL/PS. p16-positive patients had better QOL/PS at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Patients presenting with better baseline QOL/PS scores had better survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)667-677
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume97
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2017

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
  • Chemoradiotherapy/mortality
  • Cisplatin/administration & dosage
  • Dose Fractionation, Radiation
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
  • Prevalence
  • Quality of Life/psychology
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of Life and Performance Status From a Substudy Conducted Within a Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Concurrent Standard Radiation Versus Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma: NRG Oncology RTOG 0129'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this