TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing transperineal prostate biopsy to reduce infectiouscomplications
AU - Hu, Jim
AU - Zhu, Alec
AU - Vickers, Andrew
AU - Allaf, Mohamad Ezzeddine
AU - Ehdaie, Behfar
AU - Schaeffer, Anthony
AU - Pavlovich, Christian
AU - Ross, Ashley E.
AU - Green, David A.
AU - Wang, Gerald
AU - Ginzburg, Serge
AU - Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
AU - George, Arvin
AU - Graham, John N.
AU - Ristau, Benjamin T.
AU - Correa, Andres
AU - Shoag, Jonathan E.
AU - Kowalczyk, Keith J.
AU - Zhang, Tenny R.
AU - Schaeffer, E. M.
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/5/19
Y1 - 2023/5/19
N2 - Introduction Approximately one million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA, and most are performed using a transrectal approach under local anaesthesia. The risk of postbiopsy infection is increasing due to increasing antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Single-centre studies suggest that a clean, percutaneous transperineal approach to prostate biopsy may have a lower risk of infection. To date, there is no high-level evidence comparing transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy. We hypothesise that transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia has a significantly lower risk of infection, similar pain/discomfort levels and comparable detection of non-low-grade prostate cancer. Methods and analysis We will perform a multicentre, prospective randomised clinical trial to compare transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen in the first biopsy, prior negative biopsy and active surveillance biopsy setting. Prostate MRI will be performed prior to biopsy, and targeted biopsy will be conducted for suspicious MRI lesions in addition to systematic biopsy (12 cores). Approximately 1700 men will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to transperineal versus transrectal biopsy. A streamlined design to collect data and to determine trial eligibility along with the two-stage consent process will be used to facilitate subject recruitment and retention. The primary outcome is postbiopsy infection, and secondary outcomes include other adverse events (bleeding, urinary retention), pain/discomfort/anxiety and critically, detection of non-low-grade (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer. Ethics and dissemination The Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York approved the research protocol (protocol number #18-02-365, approved 20 April 2020). The results of the trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. Trial registration number NCT04815876.
AB - Introduction Approximately one million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA, and most are performed using a transrectal approach under local anaesthesia. The risk of postbiopsy infection is increasing due to increasing antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Single-centre studies suggest that a clean, percutaneous transperineal approach to prostate biopsy may have a lower risk of infection. To date, there is no high-level evidence comparing transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy. We hypothesise that transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia has a significantly lower risk of infection, similar pain/discomfort levels and comparable detection of non-low-grade prostate cancer. Methods and analysis We will perform a multicentre, prospective randomised clinical trial to compare transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen in the first biopsy, prior negative biopsy and active surveillance biopsy setting. Prostate MRI will be performed prior to biopsy, and targeted biopsy will be conducted for suspicious MRI lesions in addition to systematic biopsy (12 cores). Approximately 1700 men will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to transperineal versus transrectal biopsy. A streamlined design to collect data and to determine trial eligibility along with the two-stage consent process will be used to facilitate subject recruitment and retention. The primary outcome is postbiopsy infection, and secondary outcomes include other adverse events (bleeding, urinary retention), pain/discomfort/anxiety and critically, detection of non-low-grade (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer. Ethics and dissemination The Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York approved the research protocol (protocol number #18-02-365, approved 20 April 2020). The results of the trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. Trial registration number NCT04815876.
KW - Biopsy/adverse effects
KW - Humans
KW - Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects
KW - Male
KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Prostate/pathology
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Rectum/pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159687051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071191
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071191
M3 - Article
C2 - 37208135
AN - SCOPUS:85159687051
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 13
SP - e071191
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 5
M1 - e071191
ER -