TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors
T2 - Insights from a Large Multicenter International Prospective Observational Project (The Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score Consortium)
AU - SIB International Consortium
AU - Di Maida, Fabrizio
AU - Campi, Riccardo
AU - Lane, Brian R.
AU - De Cobelli, Ottavio
AU - Sanguedolce, Francesco
AU - Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios
AU - Antonelli, Alessandro
AU - Grosso, Antonio Andrea
AU - Noyes, Sabrina
AU - Rodriguez-Faba, Oscar
AU - Keeley, Frank X.
AU - Langenhuijsen, Johan
AU - Musi, Gennaro
AU - Klatte, Tobias
AU - Roscigno, Marco
AU - Akdogan, Bulent
AU - Furlan, Maria
AU - Simeone, Claudio
AU - Karakoyunlu, Nihat
AU - Marszalek, Martin
AU - Capitanio, Umberto
AU - Volpe, Alessandro
AU - Brookman-May, Sabine
AU - Gschwend, Jürgen E.
AU - Smaldone, Marc C.
AU - Uzzo, Robert G.
AU - Kutikov, Alexander
AU - Minervini, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - Background: To explore predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) after robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) in a large multicenter international observational project, harnessing the Surface-Intermediate-Base (SIB) margin score to report the resection technique after PN in a standardized way. Methods: Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with PN from September 2014 to March 2015 at 16 tertiary referral centers and included in the SIB margin score International Consortium were prospectively collected. For the present study, only patients treated with robotic PN were included. Uni-and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of PSMs after PN. Results: Overall, 289 patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) preoperative tumor size was 3.0 (2.3–4.2) cm and median (IQR) PADUA score was 8 (7–9). SIB scores of 0–2 (enucleation), 3–4 (enucleoresection) and 5 (resection) were reported in 53.3%, 27.3% and 19.4% of cases, respectively. A PSM was recorded in 18 (6.2%) patients. PSM rate was 4.5%, 11.4% and 3.6% in case of enucleation, enucleoresection and resection, respectively. Patients with PSMs had tumors with a higher rate of contact with the urinary collecting system (55.6% vs. 27.3%; p < 0.001) and a longer median warm ischemia time (22 vs. 16 min; p = 0.02) compared with patients with negative surgical margins, while no differences emerged between the two groups in terms of other tumor features (i.e., pathological diameter, PADUA score). In multivariable analysis, only enucleoresection (SIB score 3–4) versus enucleation (SIB score 0–2) was found to be an independent predictor of PSM at final pathology (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.25–7.63; p = 0.04), while resection (SIB score 5) was not. Conclusions: In our experience, enucleoresection led to a higher risk of PSMs as compared to enucleation. Further studies are needed to assess the differential impacts of resection technique and surgeon’s experience on margin status after robotic PN.
AB - Background: To explore predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) after robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) in a large multicenter international observational project, harnessing the Surface-Intermediate-Base (SIB) margin score to report the resection technique after PN in a standardized way. Methods: Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with PN from September 2014 to March 2015 at 16 tertiary referral centers and included in the SIB margin score International Consortium were prospectively collected. For the present study, only patients treated with robotic PN were included. Uni-and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of PSMs after PN. Results: Overall, 289 patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) preoperative tumor size was 3.0 (2.3–4.2) cm and median (IQR) PADUA score was 8 (7–9). SIB scores of 0–2 (enucleation), 3–4 (enucleoresection) and 5 (resection) were reported in 53.3%, 27.3% and 19.4% of cases, respectively. A PSM was recorded in 18 (6.2%) patients. PSM rate was 4.5%, 11.4% and 3.6% in case of enucleation, enucleoresection and resection, respectively. Patients with PSMs had tumors with a higher rate of contact with the urinary collecting system (55.6% vs. 27.3%; p < 0.001) and a longer median warm ischemia time (22 vs. 16 min; p = 0.02) compared with patients with negative surgical margins, while no differences emerged between the two groups in terms of other tumor features (i.e., pathological diameter, PADUA score). In multivariable analysis, only enucleoresection (SIB score 3–4) versus enucleation (SIB score 0–2) was found to be an independent predictor of PSM at final pathology (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.25–7.63; p = 0.04), while resection (SIB score 5) was not. Conclusions: In our experience, enucleoresection led to a higher risk of PSMs as compared to enucleation. Further studies are needed to assess the differential impacts of resection technique and surgeon’s experience on margin status after robotic PN.
KW - Partial nephrectomy
KW - Positive surgical margins
KW - Renal tumor
KW - Robotics
KW - SIB score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127164139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm11071765
DO - 10.3390/jcm11071765
M3 - Article
C2 - 35407375
AN - SCOPUS:85127164139
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 7
M1 - 1765
ER -