TY - JOUR
T1 - Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants
AU - the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA and BRCA2
AU - Barnes, Daniel R.
AU - Rookus, Matti A.
AU - McGuffog, Lesley
AU - Leslie, Goska
AU - Mooij, Thea M.
AU - Dennis, Joe
AU - Mavaddat, Nasim
AU - Adlard, Julian
AU - Ahmed, Munaza
AU - Aittomäki, Kristiina
AU - Andrieu, Nadine
AU - Andrulis, Irene L.
AU - Arnold, Norbert
AU - Arun, Banu K.
AU - Azzollini, Jacopo
AU - Balmaña, Judith
AU - Barkardottir, Rosa B.
AU - Barrowdale, Daniel
AU - Benitez, Javier
AU - Berthet, Pascaline
AU - Białkowska, Katarzyna
AU - Blanco, Amie M.
AU - Blok, Marinus J.
AU - Bonanni, Bernardo
AU - Boonen, Susanne E.
AU - Borg, Åke
AU - Bozsik, Aniko
AU - Bradbury, Angela R.
AU - Brennan, Paul
AU - Brewer, Carole
AU - Brunet, Joan
AU - Buys, Saundra S.
AU - Caldés, Trinidad
AU - Caligo, Maria A.
AU - Campbell, Ian
AU - Christensen, Lise Lotte
AU - Chung, Wendy K.
AU - Claes, Kathleen B.M.
AU - Colas, Chrystelle
AU - Berthet, Pascaline
AU - Colas, Chrystelle
AU - Collonge-Rame, Marie Agnès
AU - Delnatte, Capucine
AU - Faivre, Laurence
AU - Giraud, Sophie
AU - Lasset, Christine
AU - Mari, Véronique
AU - Mebirouk, Noura
AU - Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle
AU - Schuster, Hélène
AU - Daly, Mary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Purpose: We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Methods: Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort. Results: The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25–1.33], P = 3×10−72). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27–1.36], P = 7×10−50). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25–1.40], P = 3×10−22) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30–1.60], P = 4×10−12) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar. Conclusion: Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.
AB - Purpose: We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Methods: Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort. Results: The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25–1.33], P = 3×10−72). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27–1.36], P = 7×10−50). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25–1.40], P = 3×10−22) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30–1.60], P = 4×10−12) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar. Conclusion: Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.
KW - BRCA1 Protein/genetics
KW - BRCA2 Protein/genetics
KW - Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
KW - Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics
KW - Female
KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease
KW - Heterozygote
KW - Humans
KW - Mutation
KW - Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091841899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000548481100002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x
DO - 10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 32665703
SN - 1098-3600
VL - 22
SP - 1653
EP - 1666
JO - Genetics in Medicine
JF - Genetics in Medicine
IS - 10
ER -