Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B)

Michael B. Atkins, Opeyemi A. Jegede, Naomi B. Haas, David F. McDermott, Mehmet A. Bilen, Mark Stein, Jeffrey A. Sosman, Robert Alter, Elizabeth R. Plimack, Moshe C. Ornstein, Michael Hurwitz, David J. Peace, Sabina Signoretti, Thomas Denize, Alessia Cimadamore, Catherine J. Wu, David Braun, David Einstein, Paul J. Catalano, Hans Hammers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background To determine the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and the efficacy of nivolumab/ipilimumab salvage therapy in patients with tumors unresponsive to initial nivolumab monotherapy. Methods Eligible patients with treatment-naïve nccRCC received nivolumab until progressive disease (PD), toxicity, or completion of 96 weeks of treatment (Part A). Patients with PD prior to, or stable disease (SD) at 48 weeks (prolonged SD) were potentially eligible to receive salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B). Patients were required to submit tissue from a metastatic lesion obtained within 12 months prior to study entry and prior to Part B for correlative studies. Results 35 patients with nccRCC were enrolled: 19 (54%) had papillary, 6 (17%) had chromophobe and 10 (29%) had unclassified histology. At median follow-up of 22.9 months, RECIST-defined objective response rate (ORR) was 5 of 35 (14.3% 95% CI 4.8% to 30.3%) (complete response (CR) 2 (5.7%) and partial response (PR) 3 (8.6%)). ORR by histology was: papillary - 1/19 (5%); chromophobe - 1/6 (17%); and unclassified - 3/10 (30%). Nine patients (26%) had tumors with sarcomatoid features with 3 (33%) (2 unclassified and 1 papillary) responding. ORR was 0/18, 3/11 (27%) and 2/6 (33%) for patients with tumor progammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of <5%, ≥5% or not measured, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 (2.7-4.3) months. Two of five responders have progressed. Thirty-two patients had PD or prolonged SD and therefore, were potentially eligible for salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B), but 15 patients did not enroll due to grade 2-3 toxicity (6) on nivolumab, symptomatic disease progression (5), or other reasons including no biopsy tissue (4). In the 17 Part B patients, there was one PR (6%) (unclassified/non-sarcomatoid). Grade >3 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 7/35 (20%) on nivolumab and 7/17 (41%) on salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab with one patient experiencing sudden death. Conclusions Nivolumab monotherapy has limited activity in treatment-naïve nccRCC with most responses (4 of 5) seen in patients with sarcomatoid and/or unclassified tumors. Toxicity is consistent with prior nivolumab studies. Salvage treatment with nivolumab/ipilimumab was provided in half of these patients with minimal activity. Trial registration number NCT03117309.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere004780
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 22 2023

Keywords

  • clinical trials, phase II as topic
  • immunotherapy
  • kidney neoplasms
  • Sarcoma
  • Ipilimumab/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms
  • Salvage Therapy
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
  • Nivolumab/pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this