Phase i Study of Amrubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Advanced Solid Organ Malignancies

Shadia I. Jalal, Nasser Hanna, Robin Zon, Gregory A. Masters, Hossein Borghaei, Karuna Koneru, Sunil Badve, Nagendra Prasad, Neeta Somaiah, Jingwei Wu, Zhangsheng Yu, Lawrence Einhorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has limited treatment options. Anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide have shown synergy in many tumors. Amrubicin (AMR) and cyclophosphamide both have single-agent activity in SCLC. This phase I trial evaluated the combination of AMR and cyclophosphamide in refractory solid organ malignancies and in relapsed SCLC. Materials and Methods: The primary endpoint was to determine maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of the combination. Eligible patients were enrolled in sequential dose escalation cohorts in a standard 3+3 design. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide IV at 500 mg/m 2 on day 1 with escalating doses of AMR IV on days 1 to 3 (25 to 40 mg/m 2 with increments of 5 mg/m 2 per cohort). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Exploratory objectives analyzed the presence of NQO1 polymorphisms and topoisomerase IIA amplification and correlation with response. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 18 patients had SCLC (50%). Maximum-tolerated dose was determined to be dose level 2 (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2, AMR 30 mg/m 2) due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The main grade 3 to 4 toxicities were hematologic. Efficacy results are available for 34 patients. Partial responses, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the overall study population were 20.6% (n=7), 38.2% (n=13), and 41.2% (n=14), respectively. Partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the SCLC patients and 1 patient with extrathoracic small cell were 36.8% (n=7), 26.3% (n=5), and 36.8% (n=7), respectively. There was no correlation between topoisomerase IIA amplification or NQO1 polymorphisms and response. Conclusions: AMR and cyclophosphamide can be safely combined with little activity observed in heavily pretreated SCLC patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-335
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anthracyclines/administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
  • Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Maximum Tolerated Dose
  • Middle Aged
  • NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)/genetics
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
  • Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy
  • Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase i Study of Amrubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Advanced Solid Organ Malignancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this