Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perioperative nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable diffuse pleural mesothelioma: a phase 2 trial and ctDNA analyses

  • Joshua E. Reuss
  • , Paul K. Lee
  • , Reza J. Mehran
  • , Chen Hu
  • , Suqi Ke
  • , Amna Jamali
  • , Mimi Najjar
  • , Noushin Niknafs
  • , Jaime Wehr
  • , Ezgi Oner
  • , Qiong Meng
  • , Gavin Pereira
  • , Samira Hosseini-Nami
  • , Mark Sausen
  • , Marianna Zahurak
  • , Richard J. Battafarano
  • , Russell K. Hales
  • , Joseph Friedberg
  • , Boris Sepesi
  • , Julie S. Deutsch
  • Tricia Cottrell, Janis Taube, Peter B. Illei, Kellie N. Smith, Drew M. Pardoll, Anne S. Tsao, Julie R. Brahmer, Valsamo Anagnostou, Patrick M. Forde
  • Georgetown University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Laboratory Corporation of America
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Mark Foundation Center for Advanced Genomics and Imaging
  • Trinity College Dublin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is standard of care in advanced diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM), but its role in the perioperative management of DPM is unclear. In tandem, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ultra-sensitive residual disease detection has shown promise in providing a molecular readout of ICB efficacy across resectable cancers. This phase 2 trial investigated neoadjuvant nivolumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab in resectable DPM along with tumor-informed liquid biopsy residual disease assessments. Patients with resectable epithelioid/biphasic DPM enrolled sequentially to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) for three cycles (Arm A, n = 16) or nivolumab 3 mg kg−1 q2w for three cycles plus ipilimumab 1 mg kg−1 on cycle 1 (Arm B, n = 14), followed by surgery, optional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and nivolumab 480 mg q4w for 1 year. Co-primary endpoints included safety and feasibility; key exploratory endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and ctDNA analyses. The trial met its primary endpoints, and, in Arms A and B, 81.3% and 85.7% of patients proceeded to surgery, respectively. Treatment was safe, with a single dose-limiting toxicity in each arm. In Arm A, median PFS and OS were 9.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–27.7) and 19.3 months (95% CI: 14.9–34.7), respectively. In Arm B, median PFS and OS were 19.8 months (7.1–not reached) and 28.6 months (20.4–not reached), respectively. Persistent ctDNA was detected during neoadjuvant therapy in patients who did not undergo complete surgical resection due to disease progression (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.00013). Patients with detectable ctDNA on cycle 3 and pre-surgery had shorter PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.027 and P = 0.0059, respectively); this association was more pronounced when quantitative ctDNA changes were considered (log-rank test, P = 1.8 × 10−6). Our findings support the feasibility of neoadjuvant ICB and the clinical utility of ctDNA analyses to capture residual disease in resectable DPM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03918252.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4097-4108
Number of pages12
JournalNature Medicine
Volume31
Issue number12
Early online dateSep 8 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perioperative nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable diffuse pleural mesothelioma: a phase 2 trial and ctDNA analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this