Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF Next-Generation Sequencing Study

  • Jonathan Foox
  • , Scott W. Tighe
  • , Charles M. Nicolet
  • , Justin M. Zook
  • , Marta Byrska-Bishop
  • , Wayne E. Clarke
  • , Michael M. Khayat
  • , Medhat Mahmoud
  • , Phoebe K. Laaguiby
  • , Zachary T. Herbert
  • , Derek Warner
  • , George S. Grills
  • , Jin Jen
  • , Shawn Levy
  • , Jenny Xiang
  • , Alicia Alonso
  • , Xia Zhao
  • , Wenwei Zhang
  • , Fei Teng
  • , Yonggang Zhao
  • Haorong Lu, Gary P. Schroth, Giuseppe Narzisi, William Farmerie, Fritz J. Sedlazeck, Don A. Baldwin, Christopher E. Mason
  • Cornell University
  • University of Vermont
  • University of Southern California
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • New York Genome Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of Utah
  • University of Miami
  • Mayo Clinic
  • HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
  • BGI-Shenzhen
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Genome Read and Write
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Scopus citations

Abstract

Assessing the reproducibility, accuracy and utility of massively parallel DNA sequencing platforms remains an ongoing challenge. Here the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Next-Generation Sequencing Study benchmarks the performance of a set of sequencing instruments (HiSeq/NovaSeq/paired-end 2 × 250-bp chemistry, Ion S5/Proton, PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS), Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION/MinION, BGISEQ-500/MGISEQ-2000 and GS111) on human and bacterial reference DNA samples. Among short-read instruments, HiSeq 4000 and X10 provided the most consistent, highest genome coverage, while BGI/MGISEQ provided the lowest sequencing error rates. The long-read instrument PacBio CCS had the highest reference-based mapping rate and lowest non-mapping rate. The two long-read platforms PacBio CCS and PromethION/MinION showed the best sequence mapping in repeat-rich areas and across homopolymers. NovaSeq 6000 using 2 × 250-bp read chemistry was the most robust instrument for capturing known insertion/deletion events. This study serves as a benchmark for current genomics technologies, as well as a resource to inform experimental design and next-generation sequencing variant calling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1140
Number of pages12
JournalNature Biotechnology
Volume39
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Keywords

  • Base Pair Mismatch
  • Benchmarking
  • DNA, Bacterial/genetics
  • DNA/genetics
  • Genome, Bacterial
  • Genome, Human
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods
  • Humans
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF Next-Generation Sequencing Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this