TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient, family, and staff perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission
T2 - An exploratory study
AU - Hoge, Steven K.
AU - Lidz, Charles
AU - Mulvey, Edward
AU - Roth, Loren
AU - Bennett, Nancy
AU - Siminoff, Laura
AU - Arnold, Robert
AU - Monahan, John
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - Little is known about the coercive pressures brought to bear on psychiatric patients in the hospitalization process. Significant methodological hurdles stand in the way of this research. Most notably, reliable and valid methods of ascertaining and quantifying perceptions of coercion have not been developed. This report summarizes the findings of an exploratory study designed to gather data needed to refine the conceptualization and measurement of coercion. Multiple perspectives on admission incidents for forty‐three patients (26% of whom were involuntarily hospitalized) were obtained. Patients were administered research interviews and completed a self‐administered inventory shortly after the admission decision. The admitting clinician and a family member involved in the admission were administered parallel interviews. In addition, focus groups comprised of outpatients, former patients, family members, and clinical staff were conducted to uncover the terminology and description of coercion commonly used. The implications of these preliminary quantitative and qualitative findings for future research are discussed
AB - Little is known about the coercive pressures brought to bear on psychiatric patients in the hospitalization process. Significant methodological hurdles stand in the way of this research. Most notably, reliable and valid methods of ascertaining and quantifying perceptions of coercion have not been developed. This report summarizes the findings of an exploratory study designed to gather data needed to refine the conceptualization and measurement of coercion. Multiple perspectives on admission incidents for forty‐three patients (26% of whom were involuntarily hospitalized) were obtained. Patients were administered research interviews and completed a self‐administered inventory shortly after the admission decision. The admitting clinician and a family member involved in the admission were administered parallel interviews. In addition, focus groups comprised of outpatients, former patients, family members, and clinical staff were conducted to uncover the terminology and description of coercion commonly used. The implications of these preliminary quantitative and qualitative findings for future research are discussed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027181731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2370110306
DO - 10.1002/bsl.2370110306
M3 - Article
C2 - 10150231
AN - SCOPUS:0027181731
SN - 0735-3936
VL - 11
SP - 281
EP - 293
JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
IS - 3
ER -