Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Parallels between the development of therapeutic drugs and cancer health disparity programs: Implications for disparities reduction

  • Kenneth C. Chu
  • , Moon S. Chen
  • , Mark B. Dignan
  • , Emmanuel Taylor
  • , Edward Partridge
  • , Terrance Albrecht
  • , Claudia Baquet
  • , Laura Beebe
  • , Dedra Buchwald
  • , Clayton Chong
  • , Kathryn Coe
  • , Graham Colditz
  • , Mark Dignan
  • , Paula A. Espinoza
  • , Paul A. Godley
  • , Margaret K. Hargreaves
  • , James R. Hebert
  • , Ronda Henry-Tillman
  • , Elmer Huerta
  • , Judith Kaur
  • Howard Koh, Grace X. Ma, Cathy D. Meade, Amelie Ramirez, David Satcher, Sora Park Tanjasiri, Beti Thompson, Victor Williams Tofaeono
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Wayne State University
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of Washington
  • Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Meharry Medical College
  • University of South Carolina
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • MedStar Health
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Harvard University
  • Temple University
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • Morehouse School of Medicine
  • The California State University
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Lyndon Baines Johnson Tropical Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND. There are analogies between the development of therapeutic drugs for cancer and the development of interventions for reducing cancer health disparities. In both cases, it can take between 12 and 15 years for the benefits to become apparent. METHODS. The initial preclinical phase of drug development is analogous to the development of community partnerships and helping the community learn about cancer. The preclinical phase of in vitro and in vivo testing is analogous to identifying the disparities in the community. Then clinical testing begins with phase 1, toxicity, and dose-establishing studies. Analogously, community-based participatory research is used to develop disparities-reducing interventions (DRIs) within the community. RESULTS. The phase 2 clinical studies to determine whether the drug has activity are analogous to the DRI being implemented in the community to determine whether it can cause behavioral changes that will reduce cancer health disparities. If a drug passes phase 1 and 2 studies, phase 3 clinical trials are initiated. These are controlled studies to examine the efficacy of the drug. The similar activity for disparities research is to determine whether the DRI is better than the current standard/usual practice in controlled trials. If the drug is beneficial, the final phase is the dissemination and adoption of the drug. Analogously in disparities, if the DRI is beneficial, it is disseminated and is culturally adapted to other racial/ethnic groups and finally adopted as standard practice. CONCLUSIONS. The process of creating an effective DRI can be envisioned to have 4 stages, which can be used to aid in measuring the progress being made in reducing cancer health disparities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2790-2796
Number of pages7
JournalCancer
Volume113
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2008

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Drug Discovery
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
  • Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • United States/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parallels between the development of therapeutic drugs and cancer health disparity programs: Implications for disparities reduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this