TY - JOUR
T1 - Overview of treatment plan quality in a high dose rate prostate brachytherapy workflow
AU - Panetta, J. V.
AU - Veltchev, I.
AU - Horwitz, E.
AU - Hallman, M.
AU - Wong, K.
AU - Price, R. A.
AU - Ma, C. M.C.
N1 - Copyright © 2024 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - PURPOSE: High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for prostate cancer, with treatment plan quality dependent on a number of factors. In this work, we report on the overall performance of our ultrasound (US)-based workflow and the impact of several treatment-specific variables. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who underwent HDR-BT (boost, monotherapy, and retreatment) using Varian Bravos/US from 2021 to 2023 were sampled for this study. Treatment plan quality was analyzed and plans were categorized with regard to a number of metrics, including: prostate volume, treating physician, planning physicist, number of needles included, estimated planning time, rectum-prostate separation, and bladder-prostate separation. The performance of this program was compared to the performance of our program using previously used modality combinations: Varian Varisource/US, Elekta microSelectron/CT. RESULTS: Plan quality for our Bravos/US workflow was shown to be consistently above acceptability criteria for all personnel involved; on average: prostate V100%: 98.9% ± 0.1%, rectum V75%: 0.04 ± 0.01 cc, bladder V75%: 0.06 ± 0.01cc, urethra V125%: 0.00 ± 0.00 cc. Prostate coverage was statistically improved with this workflow compared to that using our previous modalities. There was a statistical correlation between organ-at-risk sparing/prostate coverage ratio and prostate volume, number of needles/prostate volume, bladder-prostate separation, and rectum-prostate separation. There was no correlation between plan quality and planning time. CONCLUSIONS: Our US-based HDR-BT program led to target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing that exceeded department thresholds. Results were acceptable regardless of the personnel involved and improved plan quality was obtained using more needles/prostate volume and increased spacing between the prostate and the rectum and bladder.
AB - PURPOSE: High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for prostate cancer, with treatment plan quality dependent on a number of factors. In this work, we report on the overall performance of our ultrasound (US)-based workflow and the impact of several treatment-specific variables. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who underwent HDR-BT (boost, monotherapy, and retreatment) using Varian Bravos/US from 2021 to 2023 were sampled for this study. Treatment plan quality was analyzed and plans were categorized with regard to a number of metrics, including: prostate volume, treating physician, planning physicist, number of needles included, estimated planning time, rectum-prostate separation, and bladder-prostate separation. The performance of this program was compared to the performance of our program using previously used modality combinations: Varian Varisource/US, Elekta microSelectron/CT. RESULTS: Plan quality for our Bravos/US workflow was shown to be consistently above acceptability criteria for all personnel involved; on average: prostate V100%: 98.9% ± 0.1%, rectum V75%: 0.04 ± 0.01 cc, bladder V75%: 0.06 ± 0.01cc, urethra V125%: 0.00 ± 0.00 cc. Prostate coverage was statistically improved with this workflow compared to that using our previous modalities. There was a statistical correlation between organ-at-risk sparing/prostate coverage ratio and prostate volume, number of needles/prostate volume, bladder-prostate separation, and rectum-prostate separation. There was no correlation between plan quality and planning time. CONCLUSIONS: Our US-based HDR-BT program led to target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing that exceeded department thresholds. Results were acceptable regardless of the personnel involved and improved plan quality was obtained using more needles/prostate volume and increased spacing between the prostate and the rectum and bladder.
KW - Brachytherapy/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Prostate/diagnostic imaging
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Rectum/radiation effects
KW - Workflow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205252608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.255
DO - 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.255
M3 - Article
C2 - 39343653
AN - SCOPUS:85205252608
SN - 1538-4721
VL - 23
SP - 698
EP - 704
JO - Brachytherapy
JF - Brachytherapy
IS - 6
ER -