Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results of a randomized phase II trial

  • Robert J. Motzer
  • , Brian I. Rini
  • , David F. McDermott
  • , Bruce G. Redman
  • , Timothy M. Kuzel
  • , Michael R. Harrison
  • , Ulka N. Vaishampayan
  • , Harry A. Drabkin
  • , Saby George
  • , Theodore F. Logan
  • , Kim A. Margolin
  • , Elizabeth R. Plimack
  • , Alexandre M. Lambert
  • , Ian M. Waxman
  • , Hans J. Hammers
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Northwestern University
  • Duke University
  • Wayne State University
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Stanford University
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

976 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody that restores T-cell immune activity. This phase II trial assessed the antitumor activity, dose-response relationship, and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and Methods: Patients with clear-cell mRCC previously treated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway were randomly assigned (blinded ratio of 1:1:1) to nivolumab 0.3, 2, or 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the dose-response relationship as measured by progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 168 patients were randomly assigned to the nivolumab 0.3- (n = 60), 2- (n = 54), and 10-mg/kg (n = 54) cohorts. One hundred eighteen patients (70%) had received more than one prior systemic regimen. Median PFS was 2.7, 4.0, and 4.2 months, respectively (P = .9). Respective ORRs were 20%, 22%, and 20%. Median OS was 18.2 months (80% CI, 16.2 to 24.0 months), 25.5 months (80% CI, 19.8 to 28.8 months), and 24.7 months (80% CI, 15.3 to 26.0 months), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) was fatigue (24%, 22%, and 35%, respectively). Nineteen patients (11%) experienced grade 3 to 4 treatment-related AEs. Conclusion: Nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile across the three doses studied in mRCC. No dose-response relationship was detected as measured by PFS. These efficacy and safety results in mRCC support study in the phase III setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1430-1437
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume33
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Keywords

  • Administration, Intravenous
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
  • B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors
  • Canada
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
  • Disease Progression
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Finland
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nivolumab
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results of a randomized phase II trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this