TY - JOUR
T1 - New paradigms for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in women with ovarian cancer
T2 - results of the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study
AU - Plaskocinska, Inga
AU - Shipman, Hannah
AU - Drummond, James
AU - Thompson, Edward
AU - Buchanan, Vanessa
AU - Newcombe, Barbara
AU - Hodgkin, Charlotte
AU - Barter, Elisa
AU - Ridley, Paul
AU - Ng, Rita
AU - Miller, Suzanne
AU - Dann, Adela
AU - Licence, Victoria
AU - Webb, Hayley
AU - Tan, Li Tee
AU - Daly, Margaret
AU - Ayers, Sarah
AU - Rufford, Barnaby
AU - Earl, Helena
AU - Parkinson, Christine
AU - Duncan, Timothy
AU - Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes
AU - Sagoo, Gurdeep S.
AU - Abbs, Stephen
AU - Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas
AU - Pharoah, Paul
AU - Crawford, Robin
AU - Brenton, James D.
AU - Tischkowitz, Marc
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background Over recent years genetic testing for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 has become more readily available because of technological advances and reducing costs. Objective To explore the feasibility and acceptability of offering genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods Between 1 July 2013 and 30 June 2015 women newly diagnosed with EOC were recruited through six sites in East Anglia, UK into the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study. Eligibility was irrespective of patient age and family history of cancer. The psychosocial arm of the study used self-report, psychometrically validated questionnaires (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21); Impact of Event Scale (IES)) and cost analysis was performed. Results 232 women were recruited and 18 mutations were detected (12 in BRCA1, 6 in BRCA2), giving a mutation yield of 8%, which increased to 12% in unselected women aged <70 years (17/146) but was only 1% in unselected women aged ≥70 years (1/86). IES and DASS-21 scores in response to genetic testing were significantly lower than equivalent scores in response to cancer diagnosis ( p<0.001). Correlation tests indicated that although older age is a protective factor against any traumatic impacts of genetic testing, no significant correlation exists between age and distress outcomes. Conclusions The mutation yield in unselected women diagnosed with EOC from a heterogeneous population with no founder mutations was 8% in all ages and 12% in women under 70. Unselected genetic testing in women with EOC was acceptable to patients and is potentially less resource-intensive than current standard practice.
AB - Background Over recent years genetic testing for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 has become more readily available because of technological advances and reducing costs. Objective To explore the feasibility and acceptability of offering genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods Between 1 July 2013 and 30 June 2015 women newly diagnosed with EOC were recruited through six sites in East Anglia, UK into the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study. Eligibility was irrespective of patient age and family history of cancer. The psychosocial arm of the study used self-report, psychometrically validated questionnaires (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21); Impact of Event Scale (IES)) and cost analysis was performed. Results 232 women were recruited and 18 mutations were detected (12 in BRCA1, 6 in BRCA2), giving a mutation yield of 8%, which increased to 12% in unselected women aged <70 years (17/146) but was only 1% in unselected women aged ≥70 years (1/86). IES and DASS-21 scores in response to genetic testing were significantly lower than equivalent scores in response to cancer diagnosis ( p<0.001). Correlation tests indicated that although older age is a protective factor against any traumatic impacts of genetic testing, no significant correlation exists between age and distress outcomes. Conclusions The mutation yield in unselected women diagnosed with EOC from a heterogeneous population with no founder mutations was 8% in all ages and 12% in women under 70. Unselected genetic testing in women with EOC was acceptable to patients and is potentially less resource-intensive than current standard practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973375194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103902
DO - 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103902
M3 - Article
C2 - 27208206
AN - SCOPUS:84973375194
SN - 0022-2593
VL - 53
SP - 655
EP - 661
JO - Journal of Medical Genetics
JF - Journal of Medical Genetics
IS - 10
ER -