TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≥70 with node-positive triple negative breast cancer
AU - Chhugani, Anjali
AU - Silverman, Carolyn
AU - Donovan, Brienne
AU - Bleicher, Richard J.
AU - McShane, Melissa
AU - Williams, Austin D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less frequently administered in patients > 70 years with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to age-related comorbidity and fragility concerns. This study assesses trends and clinical benefit of NAC among clinically node-positive (cN+) patients. Methods: We identified females ≥ 70 in the National Cancer Database with cN+ nonmetastatic TNBC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021. Surgical approach, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, trends in NAC use, and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were used to assess the benefit of NAC. Results: Of 4598 patients, 2377 (51.7 %) received NAC, 1210 (26.3 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (AC), and 1101 (22.0 %) received no chemotherapy. Rates of NAC increased from 29 % to 75 % (p < 0.001). NAC was more common in younger patients with larger tumors and those treated at academic institutions (p < 0.05). NAC patients were more likely to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (31 %, AC: 18 %, none: 15 %, p < 0.001). Among NAC patients, 22 % had no response to NAC, 32 % a breast pCR, 46 % nodal a pCR and 25 % pCR in both. 7 % of patients had breast pCR but remained pN+ . Overall survival (OS) did not differ between NAC and AC patients but was better than those without chemotherapy (107.6 vs. 98.2 vs. 32.6 months, respectively). Achieving breast, axillary, or total pCR was associated with improved OS in NAC patients. Conclusion: While specific chemotherapy regimens, dose reductions, and adverse events were unable to be evaluated, clinically fit patients should be counseled on NAC as an option given the potential for clinical benefit.
AB - Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less frequently administered in patients > 70 years with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to age-related comorbidity and fragility concerns. This study assesses trends and clinical benefit of NAC among clinically node-positive (cN+) patients. Methods: We identified females ≥ 70 in the National Cancer Database with cN+ nonmetastatic TNBC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021. Surgical approach, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, trends in NAC use, and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were used to assess the benefit of NAC. Results: Of 4598 patients, 2377 (51.7 %) received NAC, 1210 (26.3 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (AC), and 1101 (22.0 %) received no chemotherapy. Rates of NAC increased from 29 % to 75 % (p < 0.001). NAC was more common in younger patients with larger tumors and those treated at academic institutions (p < 0.05). NAC patients were more likely to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (31 %, AC: 18 %, none: 15 %, p < 0.001). Among NAC patients, 22 % had no response to NAC, 32 % a breast pCR, 46 % nodal a pCR and 25 % pCR in both. 7 % of patients had breast pCR but remained pN+ . Overall survival (OS) did not differ between NAC and AC patients but was better than those without chemotherapy (107.6 vs. 98.2 vs. 32.6 months, respectively). Achieving breast, axillary, or total pCR was associated with improved OS in NAC patients. Conclusion: While specific chemotherapy regimens, dose reductions, and adverse events were unable to be evaluated, clinically fit patients should be counseled on NAC as an option given the potential for clinical benefit.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Elderly
KW - Geriatric
KW - Lumpectomy
KW - Mastectomy
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Node-positive
KW - Triple negative breast cancer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020269669
U2 - 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100196
DO - 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100196
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105020269669
SN - 2950-2470
VL - 2
JO - Surgical Oncology Insight
JF - Surgical Oncology Insight
IS - 4
M1 - 100196
ER -