TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutational analysis of microsatellite-stable gastrointestinal cancer with high tumour mutational burden
T2 - a retrospective cohort study
AU - Wang, Jingyuan
AU - Xiu, Joanne
AU - Farrell, Alex
AU - Baca, Yasmine
AU - Arai, Hiroyuki
AU - Battaglin, Francesca
AU - Kawanishi, Natsuko
AU - Soni, Shivani
AU - Zhang, Wu
AU - Millstein, Joshua
AU - Shields, Anthony F.
AU - Grothey, Axel
AU - Weinberg, Benjamin A.
AU - Marshall, John L.
AU - Lou, Emil
AU - Khushman, Moh'd
AU - Sohal, Davendra P.S.
AU - Hall, Michael J.
AU - Liu, Tianshu
AU - Oberley, Matthew
AU - Spetzler, David
AU - Korn, W. Michael
AU - Shen, Lin
AU - Lenz, Heinz Josef
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Background: Genomic signatures contributing to high tumour mutational burden (TMB-H) independent from mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status are not well studied. We aimed to characterise molecular features of microsatellite stable (MSS) TMB-H gastrointestinal tumours. Methods: Molecular alterations of 48 606 gastrointestinal tumours from Caris Life Sciences (CARIS) identified with next-generation sequencing were compared among MSS–TMB-H, dMMR/MSI-H, and MSS–TMB-low (L) tumours, using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Antitumour immune response within the tumour environment was predicted by analysing the infiltration of immune cells and immune signatures using The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the impact of gene alterations on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS gastrointestinal cancers from the CARIS database, a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cohort, and a Peking University Cancer Hospital cohort. Findings: MSS–TMB-H was observed in 1600 (3·29%) of 48 606 tumours, dMMR/MSI-H in 2272 (4·67%), and MSS–TMB-L in 44 734 (92·03%). Gene mutations in SMAD2, MTOR, NFE2L2, RB1, KEAP1, TERT, and RASA1 might impair antitumour immune response despite TMB-H, while mutations in 16 other genes (CDC73, CTNNA1, ERBB4, EZH2, JAK2, MAP2K1, MAP2K4, PIK3R1, POLE, PPP2R1A, PPP2R2A, PTPN11, RAF1, RUNX1, STAG2, and XPO1) were related to TMB-H with enhanced antitumour immune response independent of dMMR/MSI-H, constructing a predictive model (modified TMB [mTMB]) for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Patients with any mutation in the mTMB gene signature, in comparison with patients with mTMB wildtype tumours, showed a superior survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS gastrointestinal cancers in the CARIS cohort (n=95, median overall survival 18·77 months [95% CI 17·30–20·23] vs 7·03 months [5·73–8·34]; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·31–0·99], p=0·044). In addition, copy number amplification in chromosome 11q13 (eg, CCND1, FGF genes) was more prevalent in MSS–TMB-H tumours than in the dMMR/MSI-H or MSS–TMB-L subgroups. Interpretation: Not all mutations related to TMB-H can enhance antitumour immune response. More composite biomarkers should be investigated (eg, mTMB signature) to tailor treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our data also provide novel insights for the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and drugs targeting cyclin D1 or FGFs. Funding: US National Cancer Institute, Gloria Borges WunderGlo Foundation, Dhont Family Foundation, Gene Gregg Pancreas Research Fund, San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild, Daniel Butler Research Fund, Victoria and Philip Wilson Research Fund, Fong Research Project, Ming Hsieh Research Fund, Shanghai Sailing Program, China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China.
AB - Background: Genomic signatures contributing to high tumour mutational burden (TMB-H) independent from mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status are not well studied. We aimed to characterise molecular features of microsatellite stable (MSS) TMB-H gastrointestinal tumours. Methods: Molecular alterations of 48 606 gastrointestinal tumours from Caris Life Sciences (CARIS) identified with next-generation sequencing were compared among MSS–TMB-H, dMMR/MSI-H, and MSS–TMB-low (L) tumours, using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Antitumour immune response within the tumour environment was predicted by analysing the infiltration of immune cells and immune signatures using The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the impact of gene alterations on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS gastrointestinal cancers from the CARIS database, a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cohort, and a Peking University Cancer Hospital cohort. Findings: MSS–TMB-H was observed in 1600 (3·29%) of 48 606 tumours, dMMR/MSI-H in 2272 (4·67%), and MSS–TMB-L in 44 734 (92·03%). Gene mutations in SMAD2, MTOR, NFE2L2, RB1, KEAP1, TERT, and RASA1 might impair antitumour immune response despite TMB-H, while mutations in 16 other genes (CDC73, CTNNA1, ERBB4, EZH2, JAK2, MAP2K1, MAP2K4, PIK3R1, POLE, PPP2R1A, PPP2R2A, PTPN11, RAF1, RUNX1, STAG2, and XPO1) were related to TMB-H with enhanced antitumour immune response independent of dMMR/MSI-H, constructing a predictive model (modified TMB [mTMB]) for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Patients with any mutation in the mTMB gene signature, in comparison with patients with mTMB wildtype tumours, showed a superior survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS gastrointestinal cancers in the CARIS cohort (n=95, median overall survival 18·77 months [95% CI 17·30–20·23] vs 7·03 months [5·73–8·34]; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·31–0·99], p=0·044). In addition, copy number amplification in chromosome 11q13 (eg, CCND1, FGF genes) was more prevalent in MSS–TMB-H tumours than in the dMMR/MSI-H or MSS–TMB-L subgroups. Interpretation: Not all mutations related to TMB-H can enhance antitumour immune response. More composite biomarkers should be investigated (eg, mTMB signature) to tailor treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our data also provide novel insights for the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and drugs targeting cyclin D1 or FGFs. Funding: US National Cancer Institute, Gloria Borges WunderGlo Foundation, Dhont Family Foundation, Gene Gregg Pancreas Research Fund, San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild, Daniel Butler Research Fund, Victoria and Philip Wilson Research Fund, Fong Research Project, Ming Hsieh Research Fund, Shanghai Sailing Program, China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China.
KW - China
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics
KW - Humans
KW - Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
KW - Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1/genetics
KW - Microsatellite Instability
KW - Microsatellite Repeats
KW - Mutation
KW - NF-E2-Related Factor 2/genetics
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - p120 GTPase Activating Protein/genetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147216992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00783-5
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00783-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 36681091
AN - SCOPUS:85147216992
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 24
SP - 151
EP - 161
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 2
ER -