TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Patients with Postprostatectomy, Postradiation Anastomotic Stenosis
AU - Sterling, Joshua
AU - Simhan, Jay
AU - Flynn, Brian J.
AU - Rusilko, Paul
AU - França, Wagner A.
AU - Ramirez, Erick A.
AU - Angulo, Javier C.
AU - Martins, Francisco E.
AU - Patel, Hiren V.
AU - Higgins, Margaret
AU - Swerdloff, Daniel
AU - Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/1
Y1 - 2024/4/1
N2 - Purpose:The treatment of urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy for prostate cancer is understudied. We evaluate the clinical and patient-related outcomes after dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (D-BMGU) in men who underwent prostatectomy and radiation therapy.Materials and Methods:A multi-institutional, retrospective review of men with vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bulbomembranous urethral stricture disease after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy from 8 institutions between 2013 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and development of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes were surgical complications, changes in voiding, and patient-reported satisfaction.Results:Forty-five men were treated with D-BMGU for stenosis following prostatectomy and radiation. There was a total of 7 recurrences. Median follow-up in patients without recurrence was 21 months (IQR 12-24). There were no incidents of de novo incontinence, 28 patients were incontinent pre- and postoperatively, and of the 6 patients managed with suprapubic catheter preoperatively, 4 were continent after repair. Following repair, men had significant improvement in postvoid residual, uroflow, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Prostate Symptom Score quality-of-life domain. Overall satisfaction was +2 or better in 86.6% of men on the Global Response Assessment.Conclusions:D-BMGU is a safe, feasible, and effective technique in patients with urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Although our findings suggest this technique may result in lower rates of de novo urinary incontinence compared to conventional urethral transection and excision techniques, head-to-head comparisons are needed.
AB - Purpose:The treatment of urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy for prostate cancer is understudied. We evaluate the clinical and patient-related outcomes after dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (D-BMGU) in men who underwent prostatectomy and radiation therapy.Materials and Methods:A multi-institutional, retrospective review of men with vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bulbomembranous urethral stricture disease after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy from 8 institutions between 2013 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and development of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes were surgical complications, changes in voiding, and patient-reported satisfaction.Results:Forty-five men were treated with D-BMGU for stenosis following prostatectomy and radiation. There was a total of 7 recurrences. Median follow-up in patients without recurrence was 21 months (IQR 12-24). There were no incidents of de novo incontinence, 28 patients were incontinent pre- and postoperatively, and of the 6 patients managed with suprapubic catheter preoperatively, 4 were continent after repair. Following repair, men had significant improvement in postvoid residual, uroflow, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Prostate Symptom Score quality-of-life domain. Overall satisfaction was +2 or better in 86.6% of men on the Global Response Assessment.Conclusions:D-BMGU is a safe, feasible, and effective technique in patients with urethral stenosis after a combination of prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Although our findings suggest this technique may result in lower rates of de novo urinary incontinence compared to conventional urethral transection and excision techniques, head-to-head comparisons are needed.
KW - buccal mucosal urethroplasty
KW - post-radiation strictures
KW - reconstructive urology
KW - salvage prostatectomy
KW - vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis
KW - Constriction, Pathologic/surgery
KW - Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods
KW - Mouth Mucosa/transplantation
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Prostatectomy/adverse effects
KW - Urethra/surgery
KW - Urinary Incontinence/surgery
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Urethral Stricture/etiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187201135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000003848
DO - 10.1097/JU.0000000000003848
M3 - Article
C2 - 38275201
AN - SCOPUS:85187201135
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 211
SP - 596
EP - 604
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 4
ER -