Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

  • Philip A. Philip
  • , Ibrahim Azar
  • , Joanne Xiu
  • , Michael J. Hall
  • , Andrew Eugene Hendifar
  • , Emil Lou
  • , Jimmy J. Hwang
  • , Jun Gong
  • , Rebecca Feldman
  • , Michelle Ellis
  • , Phillip Stafford
  • , David Spetzler
  • , Moh'd Khushmann
  • , Davendra Sohal
  • , Albert Craig Lockhart
  • , Benjamin A. Weinberg
  • , Wafik S. El-Deiry
  • , John L. Marshall
  • , Anthony Shields
  • , W. Michael Korn
  • Wayne State University
  • Caris Life Sciences
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute
  • Carolinas HealthCare System
  • University of South Alabama
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Georgetown University
  • Brown University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

176 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: KRAS mutation (MT) is a major oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A small subset of PDACs harbor KRAS wild-type (WT). We aim to characterize the molecular profiles of KRAS WT PDAC to uncover new pathogenic drivers and offer targeted treatments.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor tissue obtained from surgical or biopsy material was subjected to next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing, microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair status determination.

RESULTS: Of the 2,483 patients (male 53.7%, median age 66 years) studied, 266 tumors (10.7%) were KRAS WT. The most frequently mutated gene in KRAS WT PDAC was TP53 (44.5%), followed by BRAF (13.0%). Multiple mutations within the DNA-damage repair (BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, RAD50, FANCE, PALB2), chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, ARID2, KMT2D, KMT2C, SMARCA4, SETD2), and cell-cycle control pathways (CDKN2A, CCND1, CCNE1) were detected frequently. There was no statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression between KRAS WT (15.8%) and MT (17%) tumors. However, KRAS WT PDAC were more likely to be MSI-high (4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05), tumor mutational burden-high (4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05), and exhibit increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid dendritic cells. KRAS WT PDACs exhibited gene fusions of BRAF (6.6%), FGFR2 (5.2%), ALK (2.6%), RET (1.3%), and NRG1 (1.3%), as well as amplification of FGF3 (3%), ERBB2 (2.2%), FGFR3 (1.8%), NTRK (1.8%), and MET (1.3%). Real-world evidence reveals a survival advantage of KRAS WT patients in overall cohorts as well as in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or 5-FU/oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSIONS: KRAS WT PDAC represents 10.7% of PDAC and is enriched with targetable alterations, including immuno-oncologic markers. Identification of KRAS WT patients in clinical practice may expand therapeutic options in a clinically meaningful manner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2704-2714
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2022

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma/pathology
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology
  • DNA Helicases/genetics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microsatellite Instability
  • Mutation
  • Nuclear Proteins/genetics
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics
  • Transcription Factors/genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this