Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Molecular alteration profiles characterize intraductal carcinoma of the prostate

  • Harshitha Dudipala
  • , Shayan S Nazari
  • , Isabela Werneck da Cunha
  • , Nathan Coligado
  • , Yasmine Baca
  • , Shuanzeng Wei
  • , Andrew Elliott
  • , Norm D Smith
  • , Daniel M Geynisman
  • , Jacqueline T Brown
  • , Kevin K Zarrabi
  • , Neeraj Agarwal
  • , Emmanuel S Antonarakis
  • , Daniel Herchenhorn
  • , Rana R McKay
  • University of California
  • Caris Life Sciences
  • Institute Catala Oncologia
  • Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
  • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
  • University of Minnesota and Masonic Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is an intra-acinar and/or intraductal neoplastic epithelial proliferation that is a distinct histological entity according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Clinically, it is associated with higher grade tumors and a more aggressive disease course. However, the molecular underpinnings of IDC-P are not well elucidated.

METHODS: This study identified radical prostatectomy (RP) cases from the Caris Life Sciences database, classified as prostatic adenocarcinoma with grade group 4/5 or with the words "cribriform," "necrosis," or "intraductal" in the pathology report. Digitized hematoxylin-eosin slides underwent central pathology review by a board-certified genitourinary pathologist to identify the presence of IDC-P according to the 2022 WHO classification. IDC-P cases (n = 175) were compared to non-IDC-P cases (n = 5334). Prostatic tumor specimens were sequenced via next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing.

RESULTS: Compared to non-IDC-P cases, the IDC-P cohort had significantly more mutations in MUTYH (4.5% vs. 1.4%; p < .01), FANCA (2.7% vs. 0.5%; p < .01), NBN (2.5% vs. 0.6%; p < .05), and MTOR (0.6% vs. 0.1%; p < .05). IDC-P tumors were enriched for DLL3 and CEACAM5 expression, with lower expression of STEAP1, TROP2, ERBB2, PSCA, and B7-H3, compared to non-IDC-P tumors. IDC-P had significantly higher neuroendocrine prostate cancer signature scores and IFN-γ signature scores, and similar androgen receptor signature scores, compared to non-IDC-P. The tumor microenvironment of IDC-P had significantly higher cell fractions of M2 macrophages and fewer dendritic cells.

CONCLUSIONS: IDC-P possesses a distinct molecular and immunological profile. Understanding these molecular underpinnings is crucial for the development of personalized treatment strategies for histologically distinct prostate cancer subsets.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70238
Pages (from-to)e70238
JournalCancer
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • immune profile
  • intraductal
  • molecular alterations
  • personalized treatment
  • prostate cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular alteration profiles characterize intraductal carcinoma of the prostate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this