TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term outcome with interstitial brachytherapy in the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy
AU - Vicini, Frank A.
AU - Horwitz, Eric M.
AU - Lacerna, Mario D.
AU - Dmuchowski, Carl F.
AU - Brown, Douglas M.
AU - White, Julia
AU - Chen, Peter Y.
AU - Edmundson, Gregory K.
AU - Gustafson, Gary S.
AU - Clarke, Daniel H.
AU - Gustafson, Gregory S.
AU - Matter, Richard C.
AU - Martinez, Alvaro A.
PY - 1997/3/1
Y1 - 1997/3/1
N2 - Purpose: We reviewed our institution's experience with interstitial implant boosts to determine their long-term impact on local control and cosmetic results. Methods and Materials: Between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1987, 390 women with 400 cases of Stage I and II breast cancer were managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at William Beaumont Hospital. All patients were treated with an excisional biopsy and 253 (63%) underwent reexcision. Radiation consisted of 45-50 Gy external beam irradiation to the whole breast followed by a boost to the tumor bed to at least 60 Gy using either electrons [108], photons [15], or an interstitial implant [277] with either 192Ir [190] or 125I [87]. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome were assessed and contrasted between patients boosted with either interstitial implants, electrons, or photons. Results: With a median follow- up of 81 months, 25 patients have recurred in the treated breast for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of local recurrence of 4 and 8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the 5- or 8-year actuarial rates of local recurrence using either electrons, photons, or an interstitial implant. Greater than 90% of patients obtained a good or excellent cosmetic result, and no statistically significant differences in cosmetic outcome were seen whether electrons, photons, or implants were used. Conclusions: We conclude that patients with Stage I and II breast cancer undergoing BCT and judged to be candidates for boosts can be effectively managed with LDR interstitial brachytherapy. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome are excellent and similar to patients boosted with either electrons or photons.
AB - Purpose: We reviewed our institution's experience with interstitial implant boosts to determine their long-term impact on local control and cosmetic results. Methods and Materials: Between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1987, 390 women with 400 cases of Stage I and II breast cancer were managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at William Beaumont Hospital. All patients were treated with an excisional biopsy and 253 (63%) underwent reexcision. Radiation consisted of 45-50 Gy external beam irradiation to the whole breast followed by a boost to the tumor bed to at least 60 Gy using either electrons [108], photons [15], or an interstitial implant [277] with either 192Ir [190] or 125I [87]. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome were assessed and contrasted between patients boosted with either interstitial implants, electrons, or photons. Results: With a median follow- up of 81 months, 25 patients have recurred in the treated breast for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of local recurrence of 4 and 8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the 5- or 8-year actuarial rates of local recurrence using either electrons, photons, or an interstitial implant. Greater than 90% of patients obtained a good or excellent cosmetic result, and no statistically significant differences in cosmetic outcome were seen whether electrons, photons, or implants were used. Conclusions: We conclude that patients with Stage I and II breast cancer undergoing BCT and judged to be candidates for boosts can be effectively managed with LDR interstitial brachytherapy. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome are excellent and similar to patients boosted with either electrons or photons.
KW - Adult
KW - Biopsy
KW - Brachytherapy
KW - Breast Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Breast/pathology
KW - Combined Modality Therapy
KW - Female
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use
KW - Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use
KW - Multivariate Analysis
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
KW - Salvage Therapy
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030940676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:A1997WW11800016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00606-2
DO - 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00606-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 9128961
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 37
SP - 845
EP - 852
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 4
ER -