Lessons Learned from Mesh Litigation for Prolapse and Incontinence

Elizabeth Timbrook Brown, Joshua A. Cohn, Melissa R. Kaufman, W. Stuart Reynolds, Roger R. Dmochowski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can cause significant impairment in quality of life and lead many women to seek surgical correction. These procedures are often performed using polypropylene mesh. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Public Health Notification to inform patients of adverse events related to the use of mesh placed in these repairs. Since this time, there have been almost 50,000 legal proceedings related to complications of polypropylene mesh in the urogynecology setting. Currently, the FDA is conducting further studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polypropylene mesh, but it is still available for use in the repair of SUI and POP. Thus, patients should be carefully selected and counseled appropriately regarding conservative management options and alternative surgical therapies prior to mesh placement. As a result of the FDA recommendations, researchers are currently trying to develop a treatment alternative to mesh.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-78
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Bladder Dysfunction Reports
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FDA safety notification
  • Mesh kits
  • Mesh litigation
  • Pelvic organ prolapse
  • Stress urinary incontinence
  • Transvaginal mesh

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons Learned from Mesh Litigation for Prolapse and Incontinence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this