TY - JOUR
T1 - Latino Enclaves and Healthcare Accessibility
T2 - An Ecologic Study Across Five States
AU - Guan, Alice
AU - Shariff-Marco, Salma
AU - Henry, Kevin A.
AU - Lin, Katherine
AU - Meltzer, Dan
AU - Canchola, Alison J.
AU - Arizpe, Angel
AU - Rathod, Aniruddha B.
AU - Hughes, Amy E.
AU - Kroenke, Candyce H.
AU - Gomez, Scarlett L.
AU - Hiatt, Robert A.
AU - Stroup, Antoinette M.
AU - Pinheiro, Paulo S.
AU - Boscoe, Francis
AU - Zhu, Hong
AU - Pruitt, Sandi L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2024.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Background: Hispanic or Latino populations (hereafter, “Latinos”) are a rapidly expanding U.S. demographic and have documented inequities in preventable diseases and conditions. Many Latinos reside in ethnic enclaves, and understanding the context and healthcare accessibility within these places is critical. Objective: This study described the neighborhood social and built environment attributes of Latino enclaves and evaluated associations between enclaves and geographic healthcare accessibility. Design: Cross-sectional ecologic analysis. Subjects: Our unit of analysis was all neighborhoods (n ~ 20,000 census tracts) in California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas in years 2000 and 2010. Main measures: The primary exposure of interest, “Latino enclaves,” was defined using neighborhood-level data on the percentage of Latino residents, foreign-born Latinos, Spanish speakers with limited English proficiency, and linguistically isolated Spanish-speaking households. The primary outcome was a neighborhood-level measure of geographic healthcare accessibility of primary care physicians, which accounted for both the supply of physicians and population demand for healthcare (i.e., population size within driving distance). Results: Approximately 30% of neighborhoods were classified as Latino enclaves, 87% of which were enclaves in both 2000 and 2010. Compared with non-enclaves, Latino enclaves had more markers of structural disadvantage including having higher proportions of poverty, uninsured individuals, crowded housing, and higher crime scores. Results from multivariable models suggest that more culturally distinct neighborhoods (i.e., higher enclave score) had lower healthcare accessibility, though when stratified, this association persisted only in high (≥ 20%) poverty neighborhoods. Conclusion: This study highlights several neighborhood structural disadvantages within Latino enclaves, including higher poverty, uninsured individuals, and crime compared to non-enclave neighborhoods. Moreover, our findings point to the need for interventions aimed at improving healthcare accessibility particularly within socioeconomically disadvantaged Latino enclaves. Addressing these inequities demands multifaceted approaches that consider both social and structural factors to ensure equitable healthcare access for Latino populations.
AB - Background: Hispanic or Latino populations (hereafter, “Latinos”) are a rapidly expanding U.S. demographic and have documented inequities in preventable diseases and conditions. Many Latinos reside in ethnic enclaves, and understanding the context and healthcare accessibility within these places is critical. Objective: This study described the neighborhood social and built environment attributes of Latino enclaves and evaluated associations between enclaves and geographic healthcare accessibility. Design: Cross-sectional ecologic analysis. Subjects: Our unit of analysis was all neighborhoods (n ~ 20,000 census tracts) in California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas in years 2000 and 2010. Main measures: The primary exposure of interest, “Latino enclaves,” was defined using neighborhood-level data on the percentage of Latino residents, foreign-born Latinos, Spanish speakers with limited English proficiency, and linguistically isolated Spanish-speaking households. The primary outcome was a neighborhood-level measure of geographic healthcare accessibility of primary care physicians, which accounted for both the supply of physicians and population demand for healthcare (i.e., population size within driving distance). Results: Approximately 30% of neighborhoods were classified as Latino enclaves, 87% of which were enclaves in both 2000 and 2010. Compared with non-enclaves, Latino enclaves had more markers of structural disadvantage including having higher proportions of poverty, uninsured individuals, crowded housing, and higher crime scores. Results from multivariable models suggest that more culturally distinct neighborhoods (i.e., higher enclave score) had lower healthcare accessibility, though when stratified, this association persisted only in high (≥ 20%) poverty neighborhoods. Conclusion: This study highlights several neighborhood structural disadvantages within Latino enclaves, including higher poverty, uninsured individuals, and crime compared to non-enclave neighborhoods. Moreover, our findings point to the need for interventions aimed at improving healthcare accessibility particularly within socioeconomically disadvantaged Latino enclaves. Addressing these inequities demands multifaceted approaches that consider both social and structural factors to ensure equitable healthcare access for Latino populations.
KW - California/ethnology
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Female
KW - Florida/ethnology
KW - Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data
KW - Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Neighborhood Characteristics
KW - New Jersey
KW - New York
KW - Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data
KW - Texas/ethnology
KW - United States
KW - White
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203995729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-024-08974-6
DO - 10.1007/s11606-024-08974-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 39285075
AN - SCOPUS:85203995729
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 40
SP - 739
EP - 748
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 4
M1 - e205105
ER -