Issues in interpreting the in vivo activity of Aurora-A

Elena Shagisultanova, Roland L. Dunbrack, Erica A. Golemis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Based on its role as a mitotic regulatory kinase, overexpressed and associated with aneuploidy in cancer, small-molecule inhibitors have been developed for Aurora-A (AURKA) kinase. In preclinical and clinical assessments, these agents have shown efficacy in inducing stable disease or therapeutic response. In optimizing the use of Aurora-A inhibitors, it is critical to have robust capacity to measure the kinase activity of Aurora-A in tumors. Areas covered: We provide an overview of molecular mechanisms of mitotic and non-mitotic activation of Aurora-A kinase, and interaction of Aurora-A with its regulatory partners. Typically, Aurora-A activity is measured by use of phospho-antibodies targeting an autophosphorylated T288 epitope. However, recent studies have identified alternative means of Aurora-A activation control, including allosteric regulation by partners, phosphorylation on alternative activating residues (S51, S98), dephosphorylation on inhibitory sites (S342) and T288 phosphorylation by alternative kinases such as Pak enzymes. Additional work has shown that the relative abundance of Aurora-A partners can affect the activity of Aurora-A inhibitors, and that Aurora-A activation also occurs in interphase cells. Expert opinion: Taken together, this work suggests the need for comprehensive analysis of Aurora-A activity and expression of Aurora-A partners in order to stratify patients for likely therapeutic response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-200
Number of pages14
JournalExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Keywords

  • AURKA
  • Allosteric activation
  • Aurora-A
  • Cancer
  • NEDD9
  • PAK
  • Phosphorylation
  • TPX2
  • Targeted therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Issues in interpreting the in vivo activity of Aurora-A'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this