Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the PRESERVE Trial

  • Arvin K. George
  • , Ranko Miocinovic
  • , Amit R. Patel
  • , Derek J. Lomas
  • , Andres F. Correa
  • , David Y.T. Chen
  • , Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
  • , Michael J. Schwartz
  • , Abhinav Sidana
  • , Kristian D. Stensland
  • , Brian T. Helfand
  • , Jeffrey C. Gahan
  • , Xiaosong Meng
  • , Alice Yu
  • , Wayne G. Brisbane
  • , Srinivas Vourganti
  • , Al Baha Barqawi
  • , Edward M. Uchio
  • , James S. Wysock
  • , Thomas J. Polascik
  • Timothy D. McClure, Jonathan Fainberg, Jonathan A. Coleman
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Duly Health and Care
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Northwell Health System
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Chicago
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of Florida
  • Rush University
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • University of California at Irvine
  • New York University
  • Duke University
  • Cornell University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The PRESERVE study (NCT04972097) assessed the safety and effectiveness of irreversible electroporation (IRE) with the NanoKnife System to ablate prostate tissue in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS: This prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm pivotal trial included patients in the USA who met the key inclusion criteria: age >50 yr with organ-confined, grade group 2 or 3 PCa, clinical stage ≤T2c, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤15 ng/ml, or PSA density <0.15 ng/ml 2. The primary endpoints were the rate of local pathological complete response (negative in-field biopsy) and the incidence, type, and severity of adverse events by 12 mo. The secondary endpoints included PSA kinetics, changes in prostate volume, retreatment, and urinary/sexual function.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 121 patients treated with IRE, the negative in-field biopsy rate at 12 mo was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 79%). The secondary endpoint of negative in-field biopsy rate defined by the Delphi consensus criterion was 84% (95% CI: 76%, 90%). The time to median PSA nadir was 3.5 mo, and the median percent reduction in PSA at 6 mo was 68.2%. Urinary function outcomes had a mean change from baseline to 12 mo of 3 in the University of California Los Angeles Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain total score and a mean change of -2 in the International Prostate Symptom Score total symptom score. At 12 mo, 84% of patients with good baseline sexual function maintained erections sufficient for penetration. Fourteen (12%) patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 and three experienced procedure-related grade 3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: IRE with the NanoKnife System is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-68
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume89
Issue number1
Early online dateJul 19 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Ablation
  • Clinical trial
  • Focal therapy
  • Irreversible electroporation
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
  • Ablation Techniques/adverse effects
  • Electroporation/methods
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
  • Prostate/pathology
  • Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the PRESERVE Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this