Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Expert Consensus on Development of a State of the Art Male Perineal Anatomy Simulation Model for Urethroplasty and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Insertion

  • Andrew J Cohen
  • , Patrick Saba
  • , Mark Toto Abalajon
  • , Katherine T Anderson
  • , Nima Baradaran
  • , Cooper Benson
  • , William R Boysen
  • , Benjamin N Breyer
  • , Arthur L Burnett
  • , Felix Campos
  • , Lindsay Hampson
  • , Ty T Higuchi
  • , Niels V Johnsen
  • , Nicolaas Lumen
  • , Dmitriy Nikolavsky
  • , Joseph Pariser
  • , Jay Simhan
  • , Alex J Vanni
  • , Nick Warner
  • , E James Wright
  • Ahmed Ghazi
  • The Brady Urological Institute
  • East Avenue Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School
  • UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of California
  • Reconstructive Urology Unit Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Lahey Hospital and Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To create a high-fidelity, non-biohazardous, simulation model to train for urethroplasty or placement of artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) in the bulbar urethra. Narrow, deep and dark: the male perineum is a technically difficult area for learners to gain surgical skills and confidence. Methods: Nineteen high volume reconstructive urologists were recruited to complete a Delphi process to reach an expert consensus on parameters and design specifications for simulation. Consensus (>80%) was reached regarding procedural realism, anatomical realism, and educational effectiveness. Using validated 3D printing and hydrogel molding techniques, we fabricated a model incorporating expert determined aspects. Prototypes were sent to 11 (58%) of the experts who performed skin-to-skin AUS and urethroplasty simulations. Autopsy and questionnaires evaluated the model to determine if the consensus-defined deliverables were met, and confirm the realism of anatomy during the procedures. Results: Overall, experts agreed the model could function as a training tool for urethral surgery. 91%, 82%, and 100% agreed the model procedurally replicates the steps necessary to complete urethral exposure, tissue textures/behaviors, and overall anatomical relationships, respectively. Experts agreed on the fidelity of perineal incision/exposure (91%), urethral dissection/exposure (100%), placement of AUS pump (89%) urethral cuff measurement (100%) urethral spatulation (91%), and urethral mucosal suture placement (91%). Conclusion: We successfully designed a high-fidelity, non-biohazardous, simulation model for urethral procedures in the perineum utilizing expert consensus. The model displayed high procedural and anatomical realism, and has potential as an effective educational platform. This as a groundbreaking tool to enhance training in complex urethral surgeries, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalUrology
Volume201
Early online dateApr 14 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Delphi Technique
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Perineum/anatomy & histology
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional
  • Simulation Training/methods
  • Urethra/surgery
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/education
  • Urology/education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Expert Consensus on Development of a State of the Art Male Perineal Anatomy Simulation Model for Urethroplasty and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Insertion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this