Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Increasing external beam dose for T1-T2 prostate cancer: Effect on risk groups

  • Howard D. Thames
  • , Deborah A. Kuban
  • , Michelle L. DeSilvio
  • , Larry B. Levy
  • , Eric M. Horwitz
  • , Patrick A. Kupelian
  • , Alvaro A. Martinez
  • , Jeff M. Michalski
  • , Thomas M. Pisansky
  • , Howard M. Sandler
  • , William U. Shipley
  • , Michael J. Zelefsky
  • , Anthony L. Zietman
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • American College of Radiology
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate effect of increasing dose on risk groups for clinical failure (CF: local failure or distant failure or hormone ablation or PSA ≥25 ng/ml) in patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Patients (n = 4,537) were partitioned into nonoverlapping dose ranges, each narrow enough that dose was not a predictor of CF, and risk groups for CF were determined using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). The same technique was applied to the highest of these dose ranges (70-76 Gy, 1,136 patients) to compare risk groups for CF in this dose range with the conventional risk-group classification. Results: Cutpoints defining low-risk groups in each dose range shifted to higher initial PSA levels and Gleason scores with increasing dose. Risk groups for CF in the dose range 70-76 Gy were not consistent with conventional risk groups. Conclusions: The conventional classification of risk groups was derived in the early PSA era, when total doses <70 Gy were common, and it is inconsistent with risk groups for patients treated to doses >70 Gy. Risk-group classifications must be continuously re-examined whenever the trend is toward increasing total dose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)975-981
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Clinical disease-free survival
  • Multi-institutional analysis
  • Prostate cancer
  • Radiotherapy
  • Risk groups

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing external beam dose for T1-T2 prostate cancer: Effect on risk groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this