Improved knowledge gain and retention for third-year medical students during surgical journal club using basic science review: A pilot study

Austin D. Williams, Barry D. Mann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background As they enter the clinical years, medical students face large adjustments in the acquisition of medical knowledge. We hypothesized that basic science review related to the topic of journal club papers would increase the educational benefit for third-year medical students. Methods Students were randomized either to participation in a review session about basic science related to the journal club paper, or to no review. After one day, and after three months, students were given a 10-question quiz encompassing the basic science and the clinical implications of the paper. Results Twenty-six of 50 students were randomized to basic science review. These students scored better on both sections of the quiz one day after journal club, but only on basic science questions after three months. Conclusions Students who participated in basic science review had better knowledge gain and retention. Educational activities building upon foundational knowledge improves learning on clinical rotations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-243
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume213
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Keywords

  • Clerkship
  • Journal club
  • Medical education
  • Medical student
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved knowledge gain and retention for third-year medical students during surgical journal club using basic science review: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this