TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of target volume coverage with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-05 guidelines for transrectal ultrasound guided permanent Iodine-125 prostate implants
AU - Horwitz, Eric M.
AU - Mitra, Raj K.
AU - Uzzo, Robert G.
AU - Das, Indra J.
AU - Pinover, Wayne H.
AU - Hanlon, Alexandra L.
AU - McNeeley, Shawn W.
AU - Hanks, Gerald E.
PY - 2003/2/1
Y1 - 2003/2/1
N2 - Purpose: Despite the wide use of permanent prostate implants for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer, there is no consensus for optimal pre-implant planning guidelines that results in maximal post-implant target coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare post-implant target volume coverage and dosimetry between patients treated before and after Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-05 guidelines were adopted using several dosimetric endpoints. Materials and methods: Ten consecutively treated patients before the adoption of the RTOG 98-05 planning guidelines were compared with ten consecutively treated patients after implementation of the guidelines. Pre-implant planning for patients treated pre-RTOG was based on the clinical target volume (CTV) defined by the pre-implant TRUS definition of the prostate. The CTV was expanded in each dimension according to RTOG 98-05 and defined as the planning target volume. The evaluation target volume was defined as the post-implant computed tomography definition of the prostate based on RTOG 98-05 protocol recommendations. Implant quality indicators included V100, V90, V100, and Coverage Index (CI). Results: The pre-RTOG median V100, V90, D90, and CI values were 82.8, 88.9%, 126.5 Gy, and 17.1, respectively. The median post-RTOG V100, V90, D90, and CI values were 96.0, 97.8%, 169.2 Gy, and 4.0, respectively. These differences were all statistically significant. Conclusions: Implementation of the RTOG 98-05 implant planning guidelines has increased coverage of the prostate by the prescription isodose lines compared with our previous technique, as indicated by post-implant dosimetry indices such as V100, V90, D90. The CI was also improved significantly with the protocol guidelines. Our data confirms the validity of the RTOG 98-05 implant guidelines for pre-implant planning as it relates to enlargement of the CTV to ensure adequate margin between the CTV and the prescription isodose lines.
AB - Purpose: Despite the wide use of permanent prostate implants for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer, there is no consensus for optimal pre-implant planning guidelines that results in maximal post-implant target coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare post-implant target volume coverage and dosimetry between patients treated before and after Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-05 guidelines were adopted using several dosimetric endpoints. Materials and methods: Ten consecutively treated patients before the adoption of the RTOG 98-05 planning guidelines were compared with ten consecutively treated patients after implementation of the guidelines. Pre-implant planning for patients treated pre-RTOG was based on the clinical target volume (CTV) defined by the pre-implant TRUS definition of the prostate. The CTV was expanded in each dimension according to RTOG 98-05 and defined as the planning target volume. The evaluation target volume was defined as the post-implant computed tomography definition of the prostate based on RTOG 98-05 protocol recommendations. Implant quality indicators included V100, V90, V100, and Coverage Index (CI). Results: The pre-RTOG median V100, V90, D90, and CI values were 82.8, 88.9%, 126.5 Gy, and 17.1, respectively. The median post-RTOG V100, V90, D90, and CI values were 96.0, 97.8%, 169.2 Gy, and 4.0, respectively. These differences were all statistically significant. Conclusions: Implementation of the RTOG 98-05 implant planning guidelines has increased coverage of the prostate by the prescription isodose lines compared with our previous technique, as indicated by post-implant dosimetry indices such as V100, V90, D90. The CI was also improved significantly with the protocol guidelines. Our data confirms the validity of the RTOG 98-05 implant guidelines for pre-implant planning as it relates to enlargement of the CTV to ensure adequate margin between the CTV and the prescription isodose lines.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Brachytherapy/methods
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
KW - Humans
KW - Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037295465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=purepublist2023&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000183860000009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00387-0
DO - 10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00387-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 12648789
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 66
SP - 173
EP - 179
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -